The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Infinite Topologically Random Channel Networks
Abstract
Individual channel networks ordinarily are portions of far larger, essentially infinite, networks. The overall network is by definition at infinite topologically random network if the populations of subnetworks within it are topologically random. From such a network, the probability of randomly drawing a link, a subnetwork, or a basin with Strahler order $$\omega is 1/2^{\omega}$$; and that of randomly drawing a stream of order $$\omega is 3/4^{\omega}$$. The probability of drawing a link of magnitude $$\mu$$, that is, one having $$\mu$$ sources ultimately tributary to it, is equal to the probability of a first passage through the origin at step $$2\mu - 1$$ in a symmetric random walk, a fact which suggests a useful mathematical analogy between random walks and infinite topologically random networks. Assuming uniform link length equal to the constant of channel maintenance, which in turn is the reciprocal of drainage density, the probability distributions for links and streams of various orders may be interpreted as crude geomorphological "laws" analogous to Horton's laws of drainage composition. These distributions predict geometric-series "laws" in which, using Strahler orders, the bifurcation ratio is 1/4, the link-number ratio is 1/2, the length ratio is 2, the cumulative-length ratio is 4, and the basin-area ratio is 4, all in good agreement with the observed ratios. They also predict values of 4/3 and 2/3, respectively, for the dimensionless ratios of total number of Strahler streams to network magnitude and of Strahler stream frequency to the square of the drainage density, in agreement with the values of 1.34 and 0.694 found empirically.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: Viewing streams in a watershed context
Frissell, C. A., Liss, W. J., Warren, C. E., & Hurley, M. D. (1986) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/bf01867358 · Cited by 2,333
Topographic Partition of Watersheds with Digital Elevation Models
Band, L. E. (1986) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/wr022i001p00015 · Cited by 678
Temporal Variability Patterns and the Distributional Patterns of Stream Fishes
Horwitz, R. J. (1978) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937233 · Cited by 454
Network design for water quality monitoring of surface freshwaters: A review
Strobl, R. O., & Robillard, P. D. (2008) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.001 · Cited by 323
Scaling, Universality, and Geomorphology
Dodds, P. S., & Rothman, D. H. (2000) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.28.1.571 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Shreve, R. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Geology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1967-03
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 178-186
- ISSN
- 0022-1376 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5269
- OpenAlex
- W1970644554
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Infinite Topologically Random Channel Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/627245
- The paper
- Shreve, R. L. (1967). Infinite Topologically Random Channel Networks. The Journal of Geology. https://doi.org/10.1086/627245
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.