The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Empirical Correction Factors for the Electron Microanalysis of Silicates and Oxides
Abstract
Given suitable correction factors, the use of pure oxides and binary oxide phases as standards would make electron microanalysis independent of chemical analyses and problems of sample inhomogeneity. Ziebold and Ogilvie (1964) have shown that the calibration curve in a binary metal alloy system can, within the variance of data points, be described by the linear expression , where is the concentration of element A in alloy Ârelative to pure A, and is the background-corrected intensity of a characteristic radiation line of A in the alloy relative to that of pure A. This linear variation of the correction factor with composition can be extended to multicomponent systems by using the weighted average of the binary correction factors. Correction factors have been determined empirically for characteristic lines of ten major elements (Na, Mg, Al, Si, K, Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, and Fe) in the corresponding oxides using phases on binary and pseudobinary joins and extrapolating into more complicated systems. Where available, synthetic minerals were used as standards, but natural minerals, verified to be nearly stoichiometric by the absence of other elements as established in wavelength scans and to be nearly homogeneous by step and electron-beam scanning, were also used. The results obtained for complicated minerals such as amphiboles and micas, using oxides and simple silicates as standards, are comparable to those of standard analytical techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dehydration melting of amphibolite at 10 kbar: The effects of temperature and time
Wolf, M. B., & Wyllie, P. J. (1994) · Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology · doi:10.1007/bf00320972 · Cited by 881
Kepezhinskas, P., McDermott, F., Defant, M. J., Hochstaedter, A., Drummond, M. S., Hawkesworth, C. J., Koloskov, A., Maury, R. C., & Bellon, H. (1997) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0016-7037(96)00349-3 · Cited by 632
Wenner, D. B., & Taylor, H. P. (1971) · Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology · doi:10.1007/bf00643332 · Cited by 405
Accretionary dust mantles in CM chondrites: Evidence for solar nebula processes
Metzler, K., Bischoff, A., & Stöffler, D. (1992) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(92)90365-p · Cited by 377
(1980) · American Mineralogist · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Bence, A. E., & Albee, A. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Geology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1968-07
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 382-403
- ISSN
- 0022-1376 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5269
- OpenAlex
- W2088644964
- Cited by
- 2,123
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Empirical Correction Factors for the Electron Microanalysis of Silicates and Oxides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/627339
- The paper
- Bence, A. E., & Albee, A. L. (1968). Empirical Correction Factors for the Electron Microanalysis of Silicates and Oxides. The Journal of Geology. https://doi.org/10.1086/627339
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.