Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 311

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Basement and Sedimentary Recycling and Continental Evolution

Veizer, Ján, Jansen, Siegfried L.·1979·The Journal of Geology

Abstract

The present day cumulative distribution of areas of continental basement age provinces (as defined by radiometric estimates) follows an exponential function. A similar distribution is displayed by the reserves of their associated economic deposits and by the thickness and areal distribution data for the overlying sediments. This exponential pattern, similar to isotope decay systematics, is a result of recycling (s.l.). Each theoretically possible growth model must be complemented by an appropriate average recycling constant in order to generate the observed present day distribution. Computer simulation of the system suggests that: (a) the theoretical recycling (radiometric rejuvenation) constant b for the continental basement is $$\leq 6.5 \times 10^{-4}/10^{6}a$$. Strontium isotopic constraints favor $$2 - 4 \times 10^{-4}/10^{6}a$$ as the most likely b. Correcting for the effect of recycling, the emerging pattern of continental accretion (based on the available age data) is of a slow growth during the early Archean, fast during the ~3.0 - 2.0 Ga period, and slow during the subsequent interval: (b) the theoretically possible b for deeply buried sediments on continents is $$\leq 16 \times 10^{-4}/10^{6}a$$, but geometrical and isostatic considerations favor a b similar to that of their underlying basement; (c) the probable b for surficial sediments on present day continents is $$~45 - 67 \times 10^{-4}/10^{6}a$$. Thus it is mostly this surficial balnket, which has been involved in a rapid cannibalistic recycling during the entire geological history; (d) sediments display mafic $$\rightarrow$$ felsic secular trends in chemical composition, with a clear transition during the 3.0 - 2.0 Ga period; consistent with a major development of the continental crust during this interval. However, due to ~65 % cannibalistic nature of the sedimentary cycle, the initial mafic composition of the primordial sedimentary mass was partly perpetuated, resulting in the present day sedimentary mass, which is more mafic than its presumed source (upper continental crust); (e) consideration of the basement recycling rates suggests that the high frequency of Fe, Cr, Ni, (Au) deposits in the Early Proterozoic and the Archean is a primary phenomenon, not yet obliterated by subsequent recycling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/628425

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 311

Metadata

Authors
Veizer, J., & Jansen, S. L.
Venue
The Journal of Geology
Published
1979-07
Volume
87
Issue
4
Pages
341-370
ISSN
  • 0022-1376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5269
OpenAlex
W2003469974
Cited by
311
References
1
FWCI
6.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.