The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Global Neighborhoods: New Pathways to Diversity and Separation
Open accessAbstract
Analyses of neighborhood racial composition in 1980-2000 demonstrate that in multiethnic metropolitan regions there is an emerging pathway of change that leads to relatively stable integration These are "global neighborhoods" where Hispanics and Asians are the pioneer integrators of previously all-white zones, later followed by blacks. However, region-wide segregation is maintained at high levels by whites' avoidance of all-minority areas and by their continued exodus (albeit at reduced levels) from mixed settings. Globalization of neighborhoods adds a positive new element of diversity that alters but does not erase the traditional dynamic of minority invasion succession.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neighborhood foreclosures, racial/ethnic transitions, and residential segregation
Hall, M., Crowder, K., & Spring, A. (2015) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122415581334 · Cited by 138
Double Jeopardy: Why Latinos Were Hit Hardest by the US Foreclosure Crisis
Rugh, J. S. (2015) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/sou107 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Logan, J. R., & Zhang, C.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1069-1109
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W2059672545
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global Neighborhoods: New Pathways to Diversity and Separation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/649498
- The paper
- Logan, J. R., & Zhang, C. (2010). Global Neighborhoods: New Pathways to Diversity and Separation. American Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1086/649498
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
