The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Militarized Humanitarianism Meets Carceral Feminism: The Politics of Sex, Rights, and Freedom in Contemporary Antitrafficking Campaigns
Abstract
Over the past decade, abolitionist feminist and evangelical Christian activists have directed increasing attention toward the “traffic in women” as a dangerous manifestation of global gender inequalities. Despite renowned disagreements around the politics of sex and gender, these groups have come together to advocate for harsher penalties against traffickers, prostitutes’ customers, and nations deemed to be taking insufficient steps to stem the flow of trafficked women. In this essay, I argue that what has served to unite this coalition of "strange bedfellows" is not simply an underlying commitment to conservative ideals of sexuality, as previous commentators have offered, but an equally significant commitment to carceral paradigms of justice and to militarized humanitarianism as the preeminent mode of engagement by the state. I draw upon my ongoing ethnographic research with feminist and evangelical antitrafficking movement leaders to argue that the alliance that has been so efficacious in framing contemporary antitrafficking politics is the product of two historically unique and intersecting trends: a rightward shift on the part of many mainstream feminists and other secular liberals away from a redistributive model of justice and toward a politics of incarceration, coincident with a leftward sweep on the part of many younger evangelicals toward a globally oriented social justice theology. In the final section of this essay, I consider the resilience of these trends given a newly installed and more progressive Obama administration, positing that they are likely to continue even as the terrain of militarized humanitarian action shifts in accordance with new sets of geopolitical interests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity
Brown, W. (1995) · doi:10.1515/9780691201399 · Cited by 3,486
Ticktin, M. (2008) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/528851 · Cited by 146
Cited by
Bernstein, E. (2012) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/s11186-012-9165-9 · Cited by 411
Self-citationModern slavery and the supply chain: the limits of corporate social responsibility?
New, S. J. (2015) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-06-2015-0201 · Cited by 257
The Traffic in Women: Notes on the “Political Economy” of Sex
(2012) · Deviations · doi:10.1215/9780822394068-002 · Cited by 43
Editorial: The Presence of the Past: Lessons of history for anti-trafficking work
Davidson, J. O. (2017) · Anti-Trafficking Review · doi:10.14197/atr.20121791 · Cited by 22
Abolitionist Feminism, Liberation Psychology, and Latinx Migrant Womxn,”
Domínguez, D. (2022) · Women & Therapy · doi:10.1080/02703149.2022.2097595 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Bernstein, E.
- Venue
- Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-71
- ISSN
- 0097-9740 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-6943
- OpenAlex
- W2178216023
- Cited by
- 779
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 55.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Militarized Humanitarianism Meets Carceral Feminism: The Politics of Sex, Rights, and Freedom in Contemporary Antitrafficking Campaigns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/652918
- The paper
- Bernstein, E. (2010). Militarized Humanitarianism Meets Carceral Feminism: The Politics of Sex, Rights, and Freedom in Contemporary Antitrafficking Campaigns. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. https://doi.org/10.1086/652918
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.