Cultural Cannibalism as a Paleoeconomic System in the European Lower Pleistocene: The Case of Level TD6 of Gran Dolina (Sierra de Atapuerca, Burgos, Spain)
Abstract
Human cannibalism is currently recorded in abundant archaeological assemblages of different chronologies. The TD6 level of Gran Dolina (Sierra de Atapuerca, Burgos), at more than 800 ka, is the oldest case known at present. The analysis of cranial and postcranial remains of Homo antecessor has established the presence of various alterations of anthropic origin (cut marks and bone breakage) related with exploitation of carcasses. The human remains do not show a specific distribution, and they appeared mixed with lithic tools and bones of other taxa. Both nonhuman and human remains show similar evidence of butchering processes. The stratigraphic evidence and the new increment of the collection of remains of Homo antecessor have led us to identify a succession of cannibalism events in a dilated temporal sequence. These data suggest that hunting strategies and human meat consumption were frequent and habitual actions. The numerous evidences of cannibalism, the number of individuals, their age profile, and the archaeostratigraphic distribution suggest that cannibalism in TD6 was nutritional. This practice, accepted and included in their social system, is more ancient cultural cannibalism than has been known until now.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This conclusion supports interpretations from Gran Dolina relating to Homo antecessor.
“Certainly, this conclusion would support interpretations from Gran Dolina relating to Homo antecessor613.”
From Assessing the calorific significance of episodes of human cannibalism in the Palaeolithic (2017) · cites this paper as [13]
The similarity of demographics across Palaeolithic cannibalism episodes (adults to infants) may indicate that the motivations followed the inter- and intra-group dynamics involving resource and territory defence proposed at Gran Dolina TD6.
“However, the similarity of demographics across Palaeolithic cannibalism episodes (adults to infants) may indicate that the motivations followed the inter- and intra-group dynamics involving resource and territory defence proposed at Gran Dolina TD613.”
From Assessing the calorific significance of episodes of human cannibalism in the Palaeolithic (2017) · cites this paper as [13]
Cites
Neanderthal Cannibalism at Moula-Guercy, Ardèche, France
Defleur, A., White, T., Valensi, P., Slimak, L., & Crégut-Bonnoure, E. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5437.128 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Saladié, P., & Rodríguez-Hidalgo, A. (2017) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-016-9306-y · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationAssessing the calorific significance of episodes of human cannibalism in the Palaeolithic
Cole, J. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep44707 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Fernández-Jalvo, Y. (2021) · Journal of Anthropological and Archaeological Sciences · doi:10.32474/jaas.2021.03.000163 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Shaw, B., & Coxe, S. (2021) · Technical Reports of the Australian Museum online · doi:10.3853/j.1835-4211.34.2021.1742 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Carbonell, E., Cáceres, I., Lozano, M., Saladié, P., Rosell, J., Lorenzo, C., Vallverdú, J., Huguet, R., Canals, A., & de Castro, J. M. B.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Current Anthropology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 539-549
- ISSN
- 0011-3204 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5382
- OpenAlex
- W1548808541
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 38.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Anthropology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Keywords
- cultural cannibalism, Homo antecessor, Gran Dolina, Early Pleistocene, butchery, cut marks, bone breakage, hunting strategies, paleoeconomy, Sierra de Atapuerca
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review