The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Engaged Anthropology: Diversity and Dilemmas: An Introduction to Supplement 2
Open accessAbstract
As a discipline, anthropology has increased its public visibility in recent years with its growing focus on engagement. Although the call for engagement has elicited responses in all subfields and around the world, this special issue focuses on engaged anthropology and the dilemmas it raises in U.S. cultural and practicing anthropology. Within this field, the authors distinguish a number of forms of engagement: (1) sharing and support, (2) teaching and public education, (3) social critique, (4) collaboration, (5) advocacy, and (6) activism. They show that engagement takes place during fieldwork; through applied practice; in institutions such as Cultural Survival, the Institute for Community Research, and the Hispanic Health Council; and as individual activists work in the context of war, terrorism, environmental injustice, human rights, and violence. A close examination of the history of engaged anthropology in the United States also reveals an enduring set of dilemmas, many of which persist in contemporary anthropological practice. These dilemmas were raised by the anthropologists who attended the Wenner‐Gren workshop titled “The Anthropologist as Social Critic: Working toward a More Engaged Anthropology,” January 22–25, 2008. Their papers, many of which are included in this collection, highlight both the expansion and growth of engaged anthropology and the problems its practitioners face. To introduce this collection of articles, we discuss forms of engaged anthropology, its history, and its ongoing dilemmas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mullings, L. (2005) · Transforming Anthropology · doi:10.1525/tran.2005.13.2.79 · Cited by 216
Cited by
Casualties of Heritage Distancing: Children, Ch’orti’ Indigeneity, and the Copán Archaeoscape
McAnany, P. A., & Parks, S. (2012) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/663687 · Cited by 53
A Divided Community: The Ethics and Politics of Activist Research
Loperena, C. A. (2016) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/686301 · Cited by 30
Andrews, T. J., Ybarra, V., & Matthews, L. L. (2013) · Medical Anthropology Quarterly · doi:10.1111/maq.12048 · Cited by 28
International students in Ontario secondary schools: Demystifying the stereotype
Schecter, S., & Merecoulias, M. (2023) · Comparative and International Education · doi:10.5206/cie-eci.v51i2.13973 · Cited by 6
Food, aid, and education in East Africa: Repackaging the conversation
Stambach, A. (2016) · Cambridge Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/0305764x.2015.1102866 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Low, S. M., & Merry, S. E.
- Venue
- Current Anthropology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- S2
- Pages
- S203-S226
- ISSN
- 0011-3204 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5382
- OpenAlex
- W1520296745
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 103.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.