The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Optimization-Based Econometric Framework for the Evaluation of Monetary Policy
Open accessAbstract
This paper considers a simple quantitative model of output, interest rate and inflation determination in the United States, and uses it to evaluate alternative rules by which the Fed may set interest rates. The model is derived from optimizing behavior under rational expectations, both on the part of the purchasers of goods (who choose quantities to purchase given the expected path of real interest rates), and upon that of the sellers of goods (who set prices on the basis of the expected evolution of demand). Numerical parameter values are obtained in part by seeking to match the actual responses of the economy to a monetary shock to the responses predicted by the model. The resulting model matches the empirical responses quite well and, once due account is taken of its structural disturbances, can account for our data nearly as well as an unrestricted VAR. The monetary policy rule that most reduces inflation variability (and is best on this account) requires very variable interest rates, which in turn is possible only in the case of a high average inflation rate. But even in the case of a constrained-optimal policy, that takes into account some of the costs of average inflation and constrains the variability of interest rates so as to keep average inflation low, inflation would be stabilized considerably more and output stabilized considerably less than under our estimates of current policy. Moreover, this constrained-optimal policy also allows average inflation to be much smaller.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy
Christiano, L. J., Eichenbaum, M., & Evans, C. L. (2005) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/426038 · Cited by 6,238
The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Perspective
Clarida, R., Galí, J., & Gertler, M. (1999) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.37.4.1661 · Cited by 4,916
Estimation and Inference of Impulse Responses by Local Projections
Jordà, Ò. (2005) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828053828518 · Cited by 4,677
Understanding the Effects of Government Spending on Consumption
Galí, J., López-Salido, J. D., & Vallés, J. (2007) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1162/jeea.2007.5.1.227 · Cited by 1,922
Some Evidence on the Importance of Sticky Prices
Bils, M., & Klenow, P. J. (2004) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/422559 · Cited by 1,540
Metadata
- Authors
- Rotemberg, J. J., & Woodford, M.
- Venue
- NBER Macroeconomics Annual
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 12
- Pages
- 297-346
- ISSN
- 0889-3365 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2642
- OpenAlex
- W2127680685
- Cited by
- 2,049
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 105.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Optimization-Based Econometric Framework for the Evaluation of Monetary Policy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/654340
- The paper
- Rotemberg, J. J., & Woodford, M. (1997). An Optimization-Based Econometric Framework for the Evaluation of Monetary Policy. NBER Macroeconomics Annual. https://doi.org/10.1086/654340
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.