The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comparative Method for Both Discrete and Continuous Characters Using the Threshold Model
Abstract
The threshold model developed by Sewall Wright in 1934 can be used to model the evolution of two-state discrete characters along a phylogeny. The model assumes that there is a quantitative character, called liability, that is unobserved and that determines the discrete character according to whether the liability exceeds a threshold value. A Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm is used to infer the evolutionary covariances of the liabilities for discrete characters, sampling liability values consistent with the phylogeny and with the observed data. The same approach can also be used for continuous characters by assuming that the tip species have values that have been observed. In this way, one can make a comparative-methods analysis that combines both discrete and continuous characters. Simulations are presented showing that the covariances of the liabilities are successfully estimated, although precision can be achieved only by using a large number of species, and we must always worry whether the covariances and the model apply throughout the group. An advantage of the threshold model is that the model can be straightforwardly extended to accommodate within-species phenotypic variation and allows an interface with quantitative-genetics models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities
Gelfand, A. E., & Smith, A. F. M. (1990) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1990.10476213 · Cited by 6,606
A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data
Lewis, P. O. (2001) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/106351501753462876 · Cited by 2,929
Cited by
Phytools 2.0: an updated R ecosystem for phylogenetic comparative methods (and other things)
Revell, L. J. (2024) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.16505 · Cited by 1,244
The unsolved challenge to phylogenetic correlation tests for categorical characters
Maddison, W. P., & FitzJohn, R. G. (2015) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syu070 · Cited by 468
Statistical universals reveal the structures and functions of human music
Savage, P. E., Brown, S., Sakai, E., & Currie, T. E. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1414495112 · Cited by 440
Beaulieu, J. M., O'Meara, B. C., & Donoghue, M. J. (2013) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syt034 · Cited by 375
The evolution of host-symbiont dependence
Fisher, R. M., Henry, L. M., Cornwallis, C. K., Kiers, E. T., & West, S. A. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15973 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Felsenstein, J.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 179
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 145-156
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2025942236
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparative Method for Both Discrete and Continuous Characters Using the Threshold Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/663681
- The paper
- Felsenstein, J. (2012). A Comparative Method for Both Discrete and Continuous Characters Using the Threshold Model. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/663681
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.