Disavowing Politics: Civic Engagement in an Era of Political Skepticism
Abstract
Today, Americans are simultaneously skeptical of and engaged with political life. How does widespread cynicism affect the culture of civic participation? What are the implications for democracy? This study synthesizes data from a one-year collective ethnography of seven civic groups and theoretical work on boundary making, ambiguity, and role distancing. The authors find skepticism generates “disavowal of the political,” a cultural idiom that allows people to creatively constitute what they imagine to be appropriate forms of engagement. Disavowal generates taboos, and the authors show how disdain for conflict and special interests challenges activism around inequality. Political disavowal both facilitates and constrains civic engagement in an era of political skepticism.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
By appealing to nostalgia for natural modes of living, antigenderists tap into the antipolitical ressentiment observed on both sides of the Atlantic.
“By appealing to nostalgia for natural modes of living, they tap into the antipolitical ressentiment observed on both sides of the Atlantic (Bennett et al. 2013).”
From Gender as “Ebola from Brussels”: The Anticolonial Frame and the Rise of Illiberal Populism (2018) · cites this paper as Bennett et al. 2013
Cites
The sociology of the local: action and its publics.
Fine, G. A. (2010) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01380.x · Cited by 181 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In this way, Providence is an ideal “stage of action” that facilitates understanding of nonlocal processes ðFine 2010Þ, allowing us to understand more general processes of social action, interaction, and boundary formation.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gender as “Ebola from Brussels”: The Anticolonial Frame and the Rise of Illiberal Populism
Korolczuk, E., & Graff, A. (2018) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/696691 · Cited by 561 · see citing works
From Pillarized Active Membership to Populist Active Citizenship: The Dutch Do Democracy
Dekker, P. (2019) · Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations · doi:10.1007/s11266-018-00058-4 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bennett, E. A., Cordner, A., Klein, P. T., Savell, S., & Baiocchi, G.
- Affiliations
- Brown University (US)
- Whitman College (US)
- New York University (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 518-548
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W1968830782
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 21.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
- Keywords
- political skepticism, citizen participation, political cynicism, civil society organizations, boundary-making, ambiguity, taboos, activism, inequality, democracy, collective ethnography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review