The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rethinking the Economy with Thick Description and Weak Theory
Abstract
In this paper I rehearse the thinking steps J. K Gibson-Graham developed in order to theorize diverse economies and reveal a landscape of economic difference. Reading with and against Clifford Geertz’s 1973 essay “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture,” I discuss how “thick description” of diverse economic practices can be combined with weak theory to produce a performative rethinking of economy centered on the well-being of people and the planet. I discuss the difficulties of resisting the influence of “strong theory”—that is, powerful discourses that organize events into understandable and seemingly predictable trajectories. I outline the diverse economy, a reframing that allows for a much wider range of social relations to be seen to bear on economic practices including, to name just some, trust, care, sharing, reciprocity, cooperation, coercion, bondage, thrift, guilt, love, equity, self-exploitation, solidarity, distributive justice, stewardship, spiritual connection, and environmental and social justice. In the complexly overdetermined field of a diverse economy, we are invited to trace multiple dynamics at play. It is in the apprehension of these diverse determinations that ethnographic thick description comes into its own and leads the way toward rethinking the economy. For ethnographers today, no task is more important than to make small facts speak to large concerns, to make the ethical acts ethnography describes into a performative ontology of economy and the threads of hope that emerge into stories of everyday revolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays.
Colson, E., & Geertz, C. (1975) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2064031 · Cited by 9,103
Thick Description: Towards an Interpretive Theory of Culture
Geertz, C. (1973) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · doi:10.4324/9780203931950-11 · Cited by 4,173
Gibson, K. (2006) · Cited by 3,056
Diverse economies: performative practices for `other worlds'
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2008) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132508090821 · Cited by 1,725
Self-citationThe end of capitalism (as we knew it): a feminist critique of political economy
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3976 · Cited by 1,527
Law, J., & Urry, J. (2004) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/0308514042000225716 · Cited by 1,258
What Does It Mean to Say That Economics Is Performative?
CALLON, M. (2020) · Do Economists Make Markets? · doi:10.2307/j.ctv10vm29m.15 · Cited by 881
Gibson, K., Cameron, J., & Healy, S. A. (2010) · University of Minnesota Press eBooks · doi:10.5749/9780816684441 · Cited by 614
The work of economics: how a discipline makes its world
Mitchell, T. (2005) · European Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1017/s000397560500010x · Cited by 403
Crisis, Value, and Hope: Rethinking the Economy: An Introduction to Supplement 9
Narotzky, S., & Besnier, N. (2014) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/676327 · Cited by 401
Cited by
Crisis, Value, and Hope: Rethinking the Economy: An Introduction to Supplement 9
Narotzky, S., & Besnier, N. (2014) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/676327 · Cited by 401
(Un)making in sustainability transformation beyond capitalism
Feola, G., Vincent, O., & Moore, D. (2021) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102290 · Cited by 182
TOWARDS A POSTCOLONIAL PERSPECTIVE ON CLIMATE URBANISM
Robin, E., & Broto, V. C. (2021) · International Journal of Urban and Regional Research · doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12981 · Cited by 94
Gifts of Cooperation, Mauss and Pragmatism
Adloff, F. (2016) · Routledge · doi:10.4324/9781315692982 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Gibson-Graham, J. K.
- Venue
- Current Anthropology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- S9
- Pages
- S147-S153
- ISSN
- 0011-3204 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5382
- OpenAlex
- W2068983425
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 71.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rethinking the Economy with Thick Description and Weak Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/676646
- The paper
- Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2014). Rethinking the Economy with Thick Description and Weak Theory. Current Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1086/676646
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.