Cited by 176Philosophy and History of ScienceContemporary Sociological Theory and PracticeCritical Realism in Sociology

Common Sense and Sociological Explanations

Watts, Duncan J.·2014·American Journal of Sociology

Abstract

Sociologists have long advocated a sociological approach to explanation by contrasting it with common sense. The argument of this article, however, is that sociologists rely on common sense more than they realize. Moreover, this unacknowledged reliance causes serious problems for their explanations of social action, that is, for why people do what they do. Many such explanations, it is argued, conflate understandability with causality in ways that are not valid by the standards of scientific explanation. It follows that if sociologists want their explanations to be scientifically valid, they must evaluate them specifically on those grounds--in particular, by forcing them to make predictions. In becoming more scientific, however, it is predicted that sociologists' explanations will also become less satisfying from an intuitive, sense-making perspective. Even as novel sources of data and improved methods open exciting new directions for sociological research, therefore, sociologists will increasingly have to choose between unsatisfying scientific explanations and satisfying but unscientific stories.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/678271

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 142 · Cited by 176

Authors
Watts, D. J.
Affiliations
Microsoft (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Watts, Duncan J.
Venue
American Journal of Sociology
Published
2014-09
Volume
120
Issue
2
Pages
313-351
ISSN
  • 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5390
OpenAlex
W2090754762
Cited by
176
References
142
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4
FWCI
37.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Realism in Sociology
Keywords
common sense, sociological explanation, scientific explanation, social action, causal explanation, comprehensibility, prediction, scientific validity, sensemaking
MeSH terms
Attitude, Decision Making, Sociology, Empirical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review