Technology and Opportunity: People with Serious Mental Illness and Social Connection
Abstract
Objective: Little information exists regarding how individuals with serious mental illness use technology and whether this usage facilitates social connections. This study contributes to filling this knowledge gap by examining ways in which a sample of persons with serious mental illness use cell phones and the Internet. Methods: Interviews with 50 consumers living in supported housing were asked about their use of cell phones and computers and their perceptions of social connections. Results: Cell phones and computers allowed greater linkage with social, medical, mental health, and employment resources. Nearly all obtained phones through publicly funded programs. “Running out of minutes” was common and associated with disrupted communication and safety concerns. Few people owned computers, resulting in restricted access. Conclusion: Policy makers should consider providing free or discounted hardware, subsidizing unlimited plans, and promoting computer literacy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In 3 studies, participants did not have the resources required to use an intervention.
“in 3 studies, participants did not have the resources required to use an intervention [171,221,222].”
From Barriers to and facilitators of user engagement with digital mental health interventions: Systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [221]
Previous work has shown that social support through social networks not only increases engagement but may also have a positive effect on depression symptoms.
“Previous work has shown that social support through social networks not only increases engagement but may also have a positive effect on depression symptoms [221,222].”
From Barriers to and facilitators of user engagement with digital mental health interventions: Systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [221]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 19
- Authors
- Townsend, L., Zippay, A., Caler, K., & Forenza, B.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Montclair State University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2016-06-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 371-393
- ISSN
- 1948-822X (ISSN-L)
- 2334-2315
- OpenAlex
- W424860058
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 2.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
- Keywords
- severe mental illness, social connectedness, mobile phone use, internet use, supported housing, social support, communication resources, computer access, computer literacy, employment resources, mental health services
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review