Cited by 688Financial Markets and Investment StrategiesFinancial Risk and Volatility ModelingEconomic theories and models

A Demand System Approach to Asset Pricing

Open access
Koijen, Ralph S. J., Yogo, Motohiro·2019·Journal of Political Economy

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

We develop an asset pricing model with flexible heterogeneity in asset demand across investors, designed to match institutional and household holdings. A portfolio choice model implies characteristics-based demand when returns have a factor structure and expected returns and factor loadings depend on the assets’ own characteristics. We propose an instrumental variables estimator for the characteristics-based demand system to address the endogeneity of demand and asset prices. Using US stock market data, we illustrate how the model could be used to understand the role of institutions in asset market movements, volatility, and predictability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/701683

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Institutional investors are less likely to turn away from sustainable investments during market turbulence and economic downturns compared to retail investors.

    “All of this makes institutions less likely to turn away from sustainable investments during market turbulence and economic downturns, compared to retail investors.”

    From Sustainability Preferences Under Stress: Evidence from COVID-19 (2020) · cites this paper as Koijen and Yogo (2019)

  • Many institutional investors are subject to investment mandates that limit the universe of stocks they are allowed to invest in and the extent their holdings vary over time.

    “Most important is the fact that many institutional investors are subject to investment mandates that limit the universe of stocks they are allowed to invest in and the extent their holdings vary over time (see Koijen and Yogo (2019)).”

    From Sustainability Preferences Under Stress: Evidence from COVID-19 (2020) · cites this paper as Koijen and Yogo (2019)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koijen, R. S. J., & Yogo, M.
Affiliations
National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Venue
Journal of Political Economy
Published
2019-08
Volume
127
Issue
4
Pages
1475-1515
ISSN
  • 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-534X
OpenAlex
W3023486457
Cited by
688
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 95 · 2025: 119 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
52.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Journal of Political Economy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Chicago
  • Booth School of Business, University of Chicago
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic theories and models
Keywords
asset pricing, demand systems, investor heterogeneity, portfolio optimization, factor models, institutional investors, household investors, stock market volatility, stock return predictability, instrumental variable estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review