The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do the Poor Pay More for Housing? Exploitation, Profit, and Risk in Rental Markets
Open accessAbstract
This article examines tenant exploitation and landlord profit margins within residential rental markets. Defining exploitation as being overcharged relative to the market value of a property, the authors find exploitation of tenants to be highest in poor neighborhoods. Landlords in poor neighborhoods also extract higher profits from housing units. Property values and tax burdens are considerably lower in depressed residential areas, but rents are not. Because landlords operating in poor communities face more risks, they hedge their position by raising rents on all tenants, carrying the weight of social structure into price. Since losses are rare, landlords typically realize the surplus risk charge as higher profits. Promoting a relational approach to the analysis of inequality, this study demonstrates how the market strategies of landlords contribute to high rent burdens in low-income neighborhoods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distressed Public Housing: Where Do We Go from Here?
Schill, M. H. (1993) · The University of Chicago Law Review · doi:10.2307/1600078 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Desmond, M., & Wilmers, N.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1090-1124
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W2919913857
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do the Poor Pay More for Housing? Exploitation, Profit, and Risk in Rental Markets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/701697
- The paper
- Desmond, M., & Wilmers, N. (2019). Do the Poor Pay More for Housing? Exploitation, Profit, and Risk in Rental Markets. American Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1086/701697
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.