Untangling the Complex Relationships Governing Trait-Mediated Litter Decomposition by Detritivores and Cascading Effects on Soil Properties
Abstract
AbstractSoil organisms play a crucial role in essential ecosystem functions, such as leaf litter decomposition. Our study builds on the positive biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationship to understand how different soil fauna species affect litter decomposition via variation in their consumption rate, leaf litter selectivity, and cascading effects on soil abiotic and biotic properties. This mechanistic approach requires focusing on identity effects, which are pivotal in understanding biodiversity effects. Results were obtained from monocultures of seven detritivore species from three functional groups (isopods, snails, and earthworms) feeding on two leaf litter species. We found that decomposability is not solely a litter-specific trait. Instead, decomposition is better understood in the context of trait-mediated detritivore-litter interactions. Accordingly, we demonstrate that detritivore species (in part even within functional groups) have distinct litter selectivity and varying impacts on soil physicochemical parameters and belowground microbial communities. Our experimental approach allows us to quantify the relevant traits at multiple trophic levels, thus making a significant step toward understanding the complexity of soil ecosystems and better predicting their functioning in a changing world.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Consequences of biodiversity loss for litter decomposition across biomes
Handa, I. T., Aerts, R., Berendse, F., Berg, M. P., Bruder, A., Butenschoen, O., Chauvet, E., Gessner, M. O., Jabiol, J., Makkonen, M., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13247 · Cited by 828 · see citing works
Bouchon, D., Zimmer, M., & Dittmer, J. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01472 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Fontana, S., Rasmann, S., Bieri, Y., Frey, B., & Moretti, M.
- Affiliations
- Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH)
- University of Neuchâtel (CH)
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2026-10-01
- Volume
- 208
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 396-413
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W7155541688
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Naturalist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DORA WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Keywords
- trait-mediated indirect interactions, litter decomposition, detritivores, cascading effects, soil properties, plant functional traits, soil fauna, plant-soil feedback
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Oligochaeta, Snails, Soil, Soil Microbiology, Ecosystem, Plant Leaves, Food Chain, Biodiversity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review