The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Experimental Test for a Ceiling on Sustained Metabolic Rate in Lactating Mice
Abstract
Time-averaged sustained metabolic rates (SusMRs) of humans and wild animals have been observed not to exceed about seven times basal metabolic rate (BMR), which suggests a possible ceiling on sustained metabolic scope. We tested experimentally for such a ceiling by subtracting or adding pups to vary the litter size of lactating mother mice between five and 26 pups. Mothers could regularly wean 14pups but not more (natural litter size is 8-10). Although food intake at peak lactation increased to as much as 3.4 times virgin values and increased with litter size, digestive efficiency remained constant The mass of the small intestine and of other gut compartments increased up to severalfold at peak lactation, and as a consequence so did the intestine's brush-border uptake capacities for glucose and for proline. Time-averaged sustained metabolic rate at peak lactation reached 7.2 times BMR; this ratio is evidently close to a ceiling on sustained metabolic scope. Estimates of intestinal nutrient uptake capacities exceeded nutrient intakes by only a modest safety margin of reserve capacity. Intestinal hypertrophy during lactation tended to preserve those safety margins and thus to maintain digestive effciency. Conversely, postlactational intestinal atrophy and the modest size of the safety margins tended to avoid waste of biosynthetic energy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The physiological costs of reproduction in small mammals
Speakman, J. R. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2145 · Cited by 786
Speakman, J. R. (2008) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/ijo.2008.161 · Cited by 361
Energetics of Avian Incubation
Williams, J. B. (1996) · Avian Energetics and Nutritional Ecology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-0425-8_11 · Cited by 269
Vertebrate Gastrointestinal System
Karasov, W. H., & Hume, I. D. (1997) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp130107 · Cited by 170
Extreme events reveal an alimentary limit on sustained maximal human energy expenditure
Thurber, C., Dugas, L. R., Ocobock, C., Carlson, B., Speakman, J. R., & Pontzer, H. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw0341 · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- Hammond, K. A., & Diamond, J.
- Venue
- Physiological Zoology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1992-09
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 952-977
- ISSN
- 0031-935X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2321266105
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Experimental Test for a Ceiling on Sustained Metabolic Rate in Lactating Mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/physzool.65.5.30158552
- The paper
- Hammond, K. A., & Diamond, J. (1992). An Experimental Test for a Ceiling on Sustained Metabolic Rate in Lactating Mice. Physiological Zoology. https://doi.org/10.1086/physzool.65.5.30158552
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.