The energetic cost of feather synthesis is proportional to basal metabolic rate
Open accessAbstract
The cost of feather production, Cf (kJ · [g dry feathers]⁻¹), differs substantially between species. We studied the molt cost in one insectivorous songbird (bluethroat, Luscinia s. svecica) and one granivorous songbird (common redpoll, Carduelis f. flammea). We wanted to test whether diferences in diet, body mass (or basal metabolic rate, BMR), or the latitude of molt could explain interspecific differences. In each individual, the resting metabolism, as measured by indirect calorimetry, was positively correlated with feather production rate. The cost of feather synthesis was estimated at 836 and 683 kJ · (g dry feathers)⁻¹ in the bluethroats and redpolls, respectively. The efciency of feather production was 2.6% and 3.1%. It was concluded that neither diet nor latitudinal constraints alone could explain the differences found between species. The cost of feather production was significantly correlated with both body mass and mass-specific BMR, BMRm (kJ · g⁻¹ · d⁻¹), where BMRm currently showed the highest degree of explanation, although other factors that influence BMRm cannot be discounted. The Cf for a species with known BMRm may be estimated from the equation Cf = 270 BMRm. Species with a relatively high BMR for their size also have a relatively high Cf. The tight association of Cf and BMRm between species, and the low efciency values of feather synthesis, suggests that feather production costs include more than the costs for keratin synthesis: they mainly consist of costs of maintaining tissues necessary for feather production.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 12 · Cited by 380
- Authors
- Lindström, Å., Visser, G. H., & Daan, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Groningen (NL)
- ORCID
- Lindström, Åke
- Venue
- Physiological Zoology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1993-07
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 490-510
- ISSN
- 0031-935X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068749315
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 13.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.rug.nl
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Physiological Zoology (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Bird parasitology and diseases
- Keywords
- basal metabolic rate, mass-specific metabolic rate, Bluethroat, common redpoll, songbirds, resting metabolism, body mass, diet, latitudinal variation, keratin synthesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review