Measurement of Basal Metabolic Rates: Don't Lose Sight of Reality in the Quest for Comparability
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Macropods and lagomorphs are excluded because they have microbial fermentation in the stomach or hindgut, while shrews (Soricidae) are excluded because resting and postabsorptive conditions may be mutually exclusive.
“Macropods and lagomorphs are excluded because they have microbial fermentation in the stomach or hindgut (Stevens and Hume, 1995), while shrews (Soricidae) are excluded because resting and postabsorptive conditions may be mutually exclusive (Speakman et al., 1993).”
From Allometric scaling of mammalian metabolism (2005) · cites this paper as Speakman et al., 1993
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 9 · Cited by 36
- Authors
- Speakman, J. R., McDevitt, R. M., & Cole, K. R.
- ORCID
- Speakman, J. R.
- Venue
- Physiological Zoology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1993-11
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1045-1049
- ISSN
- 0031-935X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2306835185
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physiological Zoology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › thermodynamics and calorimetric analyses
- Keywords
- basal metabolic rate, measurement comparability, metabolic rate measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
