The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Metabolic Ceilings under a Combination of Peak Energy Demands
Abstract
Is energy expenditure limited by shared metabolic machinery for energy assimilation or by bottlenecks specific to each mode of energy expenditure? We tested this question in mice by imposing peak energy burdens of lactation and of cold stress simultaneously. We measured food intake, body and organ masses, and small intestinal brush-border hydrolase and transporter capacities in virgin female mice and in mothers nursing approximately 5, 8, or 14 pups, at either 5° C or 23° C We had already observed that mothers of 14 pups are at a limit of lactational performance at 23° C, while virgin mice at 5° C are near their limit of food intake in response to cold stress. Nevertheless, the increments in food intake due to these two energy stresses applied simultaneously proved to be additive: food intake in lactating mice at 5° C was even higher than the peak intake in lactating mice at 23° C or in virgins at 5° C. Thus, neither during peak lactation nor during peak cold stress alone was energy expenditure limited by shared machinery for energy assimilation; assimilation could be pushed even higher by adding another energy stress. Masses of the small intestine, liver, and kidney increased with food intake even more than expected from increases in body mass. These increased organ masses are adaptive and permit energy-stressed mice to process ingested nutrients at rates exceeding the capacities of unstressed mice. Safety factors (load/capacity ratios) of three intestinal brush-border hydrolases and transporters for nutrients declined toward 1 with increasing food intake. The capacity of the brush-border enzyme sucrase to produce glucose remained matched to the capacity of the brush-border glucose transporter to absorb the resulting glucose, as both varied with food intake.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The physiology/life-history nexus
Ricklefs, R. E., & Wikelski, M. (2002) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(02)02578-8 · Cited by 1,597
The physiological costs of reproduction in small mammals
Speakman, J. R. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2145 · Cited by 786
Rapid reversible changes in organ size as a component of adaptive behaviour
Piersma, T., & Lindström, Å. (1997) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(97)01003-3 · Cited by 552
Is metabolic rate a universal ‘pacemaker’ for biological processes?
Glazier, D. S. (2015) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12115 · Cited by 335
CALORIE RESTRICTION AND AGING: A LIFE-HISTORY ANALYSIS
Shanley, D. P., & Kirkwood, T. B. L. (2000) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00076.x · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Hammond, K. A., Konarzewski, M., Torres, R. M., & Diamond, J.
- Venue
- Physiological Zoology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1994-11
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1479-1506
- ISSN
- 0031-935X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2280274018
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metabolic Ceilings under a Combination of Peak Energy Demands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/physzool.67.6.30163908
- The paper
- Hammond, K. A., Konarzewski, M., Torres, R. M., & Diamond, J. (1994). Metabolic Ceilings under a Combination of Peak Energy Demands. Physiological Zoology. https://doi.org/10.1086/physzool.67.6.30163908
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.