Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 636

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hibernation versus Daily Torpor in Mammals and Birds: Physiological Variables and Classification of Torpor Patterns

Geiser, Fritz, Ruf, Thomas·1995·Physiological Zoology

Abstract

Hibernation and daily torpor are usually considered to be two distinct patterns of heterothermia. In the present comparison we evaluated (1) whether physiological variables of torpor from 104 avian and mammalian species warrant the distinction between hibernation and daily torpor as two different states of torpor and (2), if so, whether this distinction is best based on maximum torpor bout duration, minimum body temperature (Tb), minimum metabolic rate during torpor, or the reduction of metabolic rate expressed as percentage of basal metabolism (BMR). Initially, animals were grouped into species displaying either daily torpor or prolonged torpor (hibernation) according to observations from original sources. Both cluster and discriminant analyses supported this division, and further analyses were therefore based on these two groups. Frequency distributions for all tvariables tested differed significantly (P < 0.001) between daily torpor and hibernation. The average maximum torpor bout duration was 355.3 h in hibernators and 11.2 h in daily heterotherms. Mean minimum Tb's were lower in hibernators than in daily heterotherms (5.8° C vs. 17.4° C) as were minimum metabolic rates measured as rate of oxygen consumption (V̇o2; 0.037 vs. 0.535 mL O₂ g⁻¹h⁻¹), and the metabolic rate reduction expressed as percentage of BMR (5.1% vs. 29.5%). Furthermore, mean body weights were significantly higher in hibernators (2384 g) than in daily heterotherms (253 g; P < 0.001). Thus, the comparisons of several physiological variables appear to justify a distinction between the two torpor patterns. However, of all variables tested, only the frequency distributions of maximum torpor bout duration (1.5-22 h for daily torpor; 96-1,080 h for hibernation) showed a clear gap between daily heterotherms and hibernators. The minimum V̇o2 also distinguished clearly between daily heterotherms and hibernators. All other variables, including minimum Tb during torpor, did not show a complete separation between the two patterns of heterothermia. We therefore suggest that classification of torpor patterns should be based on the duration of torpor bouts or the minimum V̇o2 during torpor.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/physzool.68.6.30163788

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 636

Metadata

Authors
Geiser, F., & Ruf, T.
Venue
Physiological Zoology
Published
1995-11
Volume
68
Issue
6
Pages
935-966
ISSN
0031-935X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2223245791
Cited by
636
References
1
FWCI
8.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hibernation versus Daily Torpor in Mammals and Birds: Physiological Variables and Classification of Torpor Patterns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/physzool.68.6.30163788
The paper
Geiser, F., & Ruf, T. (1995). Hibernation versus Daily Torpor in Mammals and Birds: Physiological Variables and Classification of Torpor Patterns. Physiological Zoology. https://doi.org/10.1086/physzool.68.6.30163788

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.