The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Studying Chinese Politics: Farewell to Revolution?
Open accessAbstract
A brief discussion on the sustenance of high economic growth rate, the sustenance of communism inspite of its movement towards greater privatisation and market freedom is presented. Advanced economic development will demand new political arrangements with greater autonomy to legal institutions and civil society, without which the Peoples Republic of China could devolve into an authoritarianism that dispenses with both the ideological and the organisational features of its revolutionary past.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
From Local Experiments to National Policy: The Origins of China's Distinctive Policy Process
Heilmann, S. (2008) · The China Journal · doi:10.1086/tcj.59.20066378 · Cited by 607
Chinese Conceptions of “Rights”: From Mencius to Mao—and Now
Perry, E. J. (2008) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592708080055 · Cited by 294
Self-citation‘Rigid demand’: Economic imagination and practice in China's urban housing market
Wang, M. (2018) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1177/0042098017747511 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Perry, E. J.
- Venue
- The China Journal
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 57
- Pages
- 1-22
- ISSN
- 1324-9347 (ISSN-L)
- 1835-8535
- OpenAlex
- W2101423606
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Studying Chinese Politics: Farewell to Revolution? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/tcj.57.20066239
- The paper
- Perry, E. J. (2007). Studying Chinese Politics: Farewell to Revolution? The China Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/tcj.57.20066239
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
