The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reported Incomes and Marginal Tax Rates, 1960-2000: Evidence and Policy Implications
Open accessAbstract
This paper use income tax return data from 1960 to 2000 to analyze the link between reported incomes and marginal tax rates.Only the top 1% incomes show evidence of behavioral responses to taxation.The data displays striking heterogeneity in the size of responses to tax changes overtime, with no response either short-term or long-term for the very large Kennedy top rate cuts in the early1960s, and striking evidence of responses, at least in the short-term, to the tax changes since the 1980s.The 1980s tax cuts generated a surge in business income reported by high income individual taxpayers due to a shift away from the corporate sector, and the disappearance of business losses for tax avoidance.The Tax Reform Act of 1986 and the recent 1993 tax increase generated large short-term responses of wages and salaries reported by top income earners, most likely due to re-timing in compensation to take advantage of the tax changes.However, it is unlikely that the extraordinary trend upward of the shares of total wages accruing to top wage income earners, which started in the 1970s and accelerated in the 1980s and especially the late 1990s, can be explained solely by the evolution of marginal tax rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates?
Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355304772839588 · Cited by 10,641
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Optimal Taxation of Top Labor Incomes: A Tale of Three Elasticities
Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Stantcheva, S. (2014) · American Economic Journal: Economic Policy · doi:10.1257/pol.6.1.230 · Cited by 713
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Saez, E.
- Affiliations
- National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
- Corresponding author
- Saez, Emmanuel
- Venue
- Tax Policy and the Economy
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 18
- Pages
- 117-173
- ISSN
- 0892-8649 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2650
- OpenAlex
- W1588362236
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 15.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Tax Policy and the Economy (publishedVersion)
- National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Fiscal Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Taxation and Compliance Studies
- Keywords
- reported income, marginal tax rates, top income earners, behavioral responses to taxation, tax avoidance, business income, tax reform, Tax Reform Act of 1986, income tax returns
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review