The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Generational Accounts: A Meaningful Alternative to Deficit Accounting
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a set of generational accounts that can be used to assess the fiscal burden current generations are placing on future generations. The generational accounts indicate, in present value, the net amount that current and future generations are projected to pay to the government now and in the future. These accounts can be understood in terms of the government's intertemporal (long-run) budget constraint. This constraint requires that the sum of generational accounts of all current and future generations plus existing government net wealth be sufficient to finance the present value of current and future government consumption. The generational accounting system represents an alternative to using the federal budget deficit to gauge intergenerational policy. From a theoretical perspective, the measured deficit need bear no relationship to the underlying intergenerational stance of fiscal policy. Indeed, from a theoretical perspective the measured deficit simply reflects economically arbitrary labeling of government receipts and payments. Within the range of reasonable growth and interest rate assumptions the difference between age zero and future generations in generational accounts ranges from 17 to 24%. This means that if the fiscal burden on current generations is not increased relative to that projected from current policy (ignoring the just enacted federal budget deal) and if future generations are treated equally (except for an adjustment for growth) the fiscal burden facing all future generations over their lifetimes will be 17 to 24% larger than that facing newborns in 1989. The just enacted budget will, if it sticks, significantly reduce the fiscal burden on future generations. The calculations of generational accounts reported here are based solely on NIPA government receipts and expenditures, and reflect the age pattern of government receipts and payments as well as the projected substantial aging of the U.S. population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Death and Taxes: Longer life, consumption, and social security
Lee, R., & Tuljapurkar, S. (1997) · Demography · doi:10.2307/2061660 · Cited by 62
Fiscal Effects of Immigrants in Canada
Javdani, M., & Pendakur, K. (2014) · Journal of International Migration and Integration · doi:10.1007/s12134-013-0305-5 · Cited by 12
Sánchez-Romero, M., Patxot, C., Rentería, E., & Souto, G. (2013) · Journal of Population Economics · doi:10.1007/s00148-012-0422-z · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Auerbach, A. J., Gokhale, J., & Kotlikoff, L. J.
- Venue
- Tax Policy and the Economy
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 55-110
- ISSN
- 0892-8649 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2650
- OpenAlex
- W3122385050
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generational Accounts: A Meaningful Alternative to Deficit Accounting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/tpe.5.20061801
- The paper
- Auerbach, A. J., Gokhale, J., & Kotlikoff, L. J. (1991). Generational Accounts: A Meaningful Alternative to Deficit Accounting. Tax Policy and the Economy. https://doi.org/10.1086/tpe.5.20061801
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.