Cited by 132Planetary Science and ExplorationAstro and Planetary ScienceSpace Satellite Systems and Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

THE ORBITS AND MASSES OF THE MARTIAN SATELLITES AND THE LIBRATION OF PHOBOS

Open access
Jacobson, R. A.·2010·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

This paper reports on an update to the orbits and masses of the Martian satellites Phobos and Deimos. We obtained the orbits by fitting a numerical integration to all available Earth-based astrometry through the opposition of 2003, spacecraft imaging observations through 2007, and the Doppler tracking of the Viking and Phobos 2 spacecraft; the Doppler data provide information on the satellite masses. Our dynamical model included the figure acceleration due to a librating Phobos; we determined the amplitude of the forced libration. We also took into account the secular acceleration of Phobos due to the tide that it raises on Mars and estimated the Martian tidal quality factor Q . We provide an assessment of the accuracy of the orbits and a geometrical description of the orbits in the form of mean elements.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-6256/139/2/668

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Phobos's rate of orbital decay is now known to be about 1.8 cm yr−1.

    “Phobos’s rate of orbital decay is now known to be about 1.8 cm yr−1 (R. A. Jacobson 2010).”

    From Phobos is not Hollow (2026) · cites this paper as R. A. Jacobson 2010

    Section 4.4 reports a measured secular acceleration in Phobos’s mean longitude and attributes it to tides raised on Mars, supporting the claim that its orbit is changing. It does not state an orbital-decay rate of about 1.8 cm per year; the rate in the citing sentence is therefore not supported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Given current measurements of Phobos's orbital period accurate to ∼10−4 s, the orbital period decay of 2 × 10−4 s yr−1 would be detectable within 1 yr of observation.

    “Given that current measurements of Phobos’s orbital period are accurate to ∼10−4 s (R. A. Jacobson 2010), the orbital period decay of 2 × 10−4 s yr−1 would be detectable within 1 yr of observation.”

    From Phobos is not Hollow (2026) · cites this paper as R. A. Jacobson 2010

    Table 6 gives Phobos’s mean orbital motion, but no uncertainty from which to verify an orbital-period accuracy of ∼10⁻⁴ s. Section 6, “Accuracy of the Orbits,” discusses position and mean-motion uncertainties without quantifying period accuracy in seconds. The citation is attached to the measurement-accuracy clause, not the citing authors’ one-year detectability inference; searches for period accuracy and uncertainty did not establish the cited figure. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Current measurements of Phobos's orbital period are accurate to ∼10−4 s.

    “Given that current measurements of Phobos’s orbital period are accurate to ∼10−4 s (R. A. Jacobson 2010), the orbital period decay of 2 × 10−4 s yr−1 would be detectable within 1 yr of observation.”

    From Phobos is not Hollow (2026) · cites this paper as R. A. Jacobson 2010

    Table 6 gives Phobos’s mean-longitude rate, but does not give an uncertainty for its orbital period. Section 6, “Accuracy of the Orbits,” discusses position and mean-motion uncertainties without establishing period accuracy of approximately 10⁻⁴ s (searched: orbital period accuracy, seconds, and mean-motion uncertainty). (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Phobos is not hollow.

    “Phobos is not Hollow”

    From Phobos is not Hollow (2026) · cites this paper as R. A. Jacobson 2010

    Section 4.2 discusses estimates of Phobos’s mass, while Section 4.3 models its gravitational effects and libration. Neither addresses whether Phobos is hollow. Searches for hollow, interior, porosity, and density found no passage establishing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 118

  1. Aitken, 1909, Lick Obs. Bull., 5, 169, 10.5479/ADS/bib/1909LicOB.5.169A · DOI
  2. 10.1029/2008EO060007 · DOI
  3. 10.1051/0004-6361/200911645 · DOI
  4. 10.1086/102697 · DOI
  5. 10.1086/103830 · DOI
  6. Bashtova, 1973, Tsirk. Astron. Inst. Tashkent, 42, 35
  7. Bent, 1976, Effect of the Ionosphere on Space Systems and Communications, 13
  8. Berthias, 1990, Analysis of the Phobos 2 Radiometric Data Set, Interoffice Memo 314.6-1129 (Internal Document)
  9. Bierman, 1977, Factorization Methods for Discrete Sequential Estimation
  10. Bills, 2005, J. Geophys. Res., 110, 1
  11. Bobylev, 1991, Pulkovo Gl. Astron. Obs. Izv., 207, 37
  12. Borderies, 1990, A&A, 233, 235
  13. 10.1007/BF01228626 · DOI
  14. Brown, 1891, Observations Made During the Year 1886, 130
  15. 10.1086/101776 · DOI
  16. 10.1086/102180 · DOI
  17. Chao, 1971, New Troposphere Range Corrections with Seasonal Adjustment, Technical Report 32-1526, VI, 67
  18. Chapront-Touzé, 1990, A&A, 240, 159
  19. 10.1029/JB084iB14p07943 · DOI
  20. 10.1029/GL004i012p00555 · DOI
  21. Christie, 1878, MNRAS, 38, 361
  22. Colas, 1992, A&AS, 96, 485
  23. Colas, 1991, A&A, 252, 402
  24. Common, 1878, MNRAS, 38, 97, 10.1093/mnras/38.3.97 · DOI
  25. Common, 1879, MNRAS, 40, 95, 10.1093/mnras/40.2.95 · DOI
  26. Common, 1882, Astron. Nachr., 103, 233
  27. Deutsch, 1970, Pulkovo Gl. Astron. Obs. Izv., 185, 103
  28. Duxbury, 1977, Planetary Satellites, 346
  29. Duxbury, 1988, A&A, 201, 169
  30. Duxbury, 1989, A&A, 216, 284
  31. Ekelund, 1980, Astrodynamics 1979
  32. Emelyanov, 1993, A&A, 267, 634
  33. Fatchikhin, 1970, Izv. Gl. Astron. Obs. Pulkovo, 185, 110
  34. Folkner, 1994, Effect of Uncalibrated Particles on Doppler Tracking, Interoffice Memo 335.1-94-005 (Internal Document)
  35. Folkner, 2008, The Planetary and Lunar Ephemeris DE421, Interoffice Memo 343R-08-003 Internal Document)
  36. 10.1029/JS082i028p04325 · DOI
  37. Hall, 1878, Observations and Orbits of the Satellites of Mars with Data for Ephemerides
  38. Hall, 1880, MNRAS, 40, 272, 10.1093/mnras/40.5.272 · DOI
  39. Hall, 1882, Astron. Nachr., 102, 217
  40. Hall, 1884, MNRAS, 44, 358, 10.1093/mnras/44.7.358 · DOI
  41. 10.1086/101066 · DOI
  42. 10.1086/101422 · DOI
  43. 10.1086/101844 · DOI
  44. Hildebrand, 1979, Natural and Artificial Satellite Motion, 353
  45. 10.1086/102837 · DOI
  46. IAU, 2006, Resolution B3: Re-definition of Barycentric Dynamical Time, TDB
  47. Ivanov, 1988, Pis'ma Astron. Zh., 14, 956
  48. Jacobson, 1995, Ephemerides of the Martian Satellites, Interoffice Memo. 312.1-95-142 (Internal Document)
  49. Jacobson, 2007, First International Conf. on the Exploration of Phobos and Deimos, The Orbits of the Martian Satellites, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA
  50. Jacobson, 2008, BAAS, 40, 481
  51. Jacobson, 2009, BAAS, 41, 902
  52. Jacobson, 1989, A&A, 225, 548
  53. Jeffers, 1925, Lick Obs. Bull., 12, 4, 10.5479/ADS/bib/1925LicOB.12.4J · DOI
  54. Jones, 1989, MNRAS, 237, 15, 10.1093/mnras/237.1.15P · DOI
  55. Kalinichenko, 1990, Abastumanskaia Astrofizicheskaia Biulleten, 68, 99
  56. Karimova, 1969, Astron. Tsirk., 530, 5
  57. 10.1086/101054 · DOI
  58. 10.1086/101432 · DOI
  59. Khatisov, 1974, Abastumanskaia Astrofizicheskaia Biulleten, 45, 71
  60. Khatisov, 1975, Abastumanskaia Astrofizicheskaia Biulleten, 46, 217
  61. Kiselev, 1989, Pulkovo Gl. Astron. Obs. Izv., 206, 33
  62. Kiseleva, 1976, Izv. Gl. Astron. Obs. Pulkovo, 194, 127
  63. Kiseleva, 1988, Abastumanskaia Astrofizicheskaia Biulleten, 63, 31
  64. Kolyuka, 1990, Sov. Astron. Lett., 16, 168
  65. Kolyuka, 1991, A&A, 244, 236
  66. 10.1016/j.icarus.2005.12.025 · DOI
  67. Kostinsky, 1897, Bull. Acad. Imp. Sci. St. Petersbourg, 7, 399
  68. Kostinsky, 1913, Mitt. Nikolai-Hauptsternwarte Pulkovo, 5, 149
  69. Kovalenko, 1980, Vestn. Kiev Univ. Astron., 22, 78
  70. Kovalenko, 1969, Vestn. Kiev Univ. Astron., 11, 129
  71. Kroger, 1992, JPL TDA Progress Report 42-111, 133
  72. Kudryavtsev, 1992, The Improved Martian Satellites Positional Series Derived from the Observations during the 1988 Opposition, Technical Report
  73. 10.1051/0004-6361:20065466 · DOI
  74. 10.1029/2000JE001426 · DOI
  75. Lindsay, 1879, MNRAS, 40, 102, 10.1093/mnras/40.2.102 · DOI
  76. Mackenzie, 2006, Whitening Doppler Data for Planetary Gravity Field Determination, Interoffice Memo 343J-06-034 (Internal Document)
  77. Maunder, 1880, MNRAS, 40, 161, 10.1093/mnras/40.3.161 · DOI
  78. 10.1007/BF00907581 · DOI
  79. Morley, 1989, A&AS, 77, 209
  80. Morley, 1990, A&AS, 228, 260
  81. Moyer, 1971, Mathematical Formulation of the Double-Precision Orbit Determination Program, Technical Report 32-1527
  82. Newall, 1895, MNRAS, 55, 348, 10.1093/mnras/55.7.348 · DOI
  83. Nikonov, 1991, Pulkovo Gl. Astron. Obs. Izv., 207, 52
  84. 10.1051/0004-6361:20053929 · DOI
  85. Peters, 1981, A&A, 104, 37
  86. Pickering, 1882, Annals of the Astronomical Observatory of Harvard College, Vol. 8, Part 1, chaps 5 and 6
  87. Pritchard, 1880, MNRAS, 40, 292, 10.1093/mnras/40.5.292 · DOI
  88. 10.1002/asna.18800970307 · DOI
  89. 10.1002/asna.18780911203 · DOI
  90. Rainey, 2006, 37th Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conf., 2138
  91. 10.1016/0019-1035(64)90048-X · DOI
  92. Rizvanov, 1969, Izv. Astron. Ehngel'gardt Obs., 37, 153
  93. 10.1016/j.pss.2008.02.004 · DOI
  94. 10.1029/2008EO060007 · DOI
  95. 10.1038/341581a0 · DOI
  96. 10.1086/102671 · DOI
  97. 10.1134/S0038094608040047 · DOI
  98. 10.1007/BF01228625 · DOI
  99. Shor, 1989, Some Results of Mars' Satellites Observational Campaign in 1988, Technical Report
  100. Sinclair, 1972, MNRAS, 155, 249, 10.1093/mnras/155.2.249 · DOI
  101. 10.1016/0083-6656(78)90011-9 · DOI
  102. 10.1029/95GL01801 · DOI
  103. 10.1029/93JE01839 · DOI
  104. 10.1029/JS082i028p03971 · DOI
  105. 10.1029/JB084iB14p07917 · DOI
  106. Struve, 1898, Memories de L'Académie Impériale des Sciences de St. Petersbourg, 8
  107. Tolbin, 1985, Izv. Gl. Astron. Obs. Pulkovo, 203, 44
  108. 10.1029/GL004i012p00551 · DOI
  109. USNO, 1911, Publ. U. S. Naval Observatory, VI, Ser., 2, A3
  110. USNO, 1929, Publ. U. S. Naval Observatory, XII, Ser., 2, 81
  111. USNO, 1954, Publ. U. S. Naval Observatory, XVII, Ser. 2, Part, III, 125
  112. van Biesbroeck, 1970, Commun. Lunar Planet. Lab., 8, 179
  113. 10.1051/0004-6361:200809498 · DOI
  114. Williams, 1988, Abs. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf., 19, 1274
  115. 10.1051/0004-6361:200809787 · DOI
  116. Wirtz, 1909, Ann. Kaiser. Universitaets-Sternwarte Strassburg, Karlsruhe, 3, 5
  117. Wirtz, 1912, Ann. Kaiser. Universitaets-Sternwarte Strassburg, Karlsruhe, 4, 292
  118. 10.1029/2000JE001302 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jacobson, R. A.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Jacobson, R. A.
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2010-01-14
Volume
139
Issue
2
Pages
668-679
ISSN
  • 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3881
OpenAlex
W1963902468
Cited by
132
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
The Astronomical Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • California Institute of Technology
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
Keywords
Phobos, Deimos, Mars satellites, satellite orbits, satellite mass, tidal acceleration, tidal quality factor, mean orbital elements, orbit determination, Doppler tracking, astrometry, spacecraft imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review