The DOI matches its Crossref record.
CATALOG OF 93 NOVA LIGHT CURVES: CLASSIFICATION AND PROPERTIES
Open accessAbstract
We present a catalog of 93 very-well-observed nova light curves. The light curves were constructed from 229,796 individual measured magnitudes, with the median coverage extending to 8.0 mag below peak and 26% of the light curves following the eruption all the way to quiescence. Our time-binned light curves are presented in figures and as complete tabulations. We also calculate and tabulate many properties about the light curves, including peak magnitudes and dates, times to decline by 2, 3, 6, and 9 mag from maximum, the time until the brightness returns to quiescence, the quiescent magnitude, power-law indices of the decline rates throughout the eruption, the break times in this decline, plus many more properties specific to each nova class. We present a classification system for nova light curves based on the shape and the time to decline by 3 mag from the peak ( t 3 ). The designations are "S" for smooth light curves (38% of the novae), "P" for plateaus (21%), "D" for dust dips (18%), "C" for cusp-shaped secondary maxima (1%), "O" for quasi-sinusoidal oscillations superposed on an otherwise smooth decline (4%), "F" for flat-topped light curves (2%), and "J" for jitters or flares superposed on the decline (16%). Our classification consists of this single letter followed by the t 3 value in parentheses; so, for example, V1500 Cyg is S(4), GK Per is O(13), DQ Her is D(100), and U Sco is P(3).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“And the claim that the Star was an earlier eruption of the 'recurrent nova' DO Aquilae is certainly wrong because DO Aquilae is not a recurrent novae (so it did not erupt in 5 BC) and it could not possibly have gotten to be bright enough to be visible to the unaided eye.”
From Astronomical and Historical Evaluation of Molnar's Solution for the Star of Bethlehem (2016) · cites this paper as Strope, Schaefer, & Henden 2010
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 77
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20031160 · DOI
- Bertiau, 1954, Leiden Ann., 20, 358
- 10.1002/asna.19292352404 · DOI
- Bianchini, 1992, A&A, 257, 599
- 10.1017/CBO9780511536168 · DOI
- 10.1134/S1063773708070050 · DOI
- Chochol, 1999, Mem. Soc. Astron. Ital., 70, 1025
- Collazzi, 2009, AJ, 138, 1846, 10.1088/0004-6256/138/6/1846 · DOI
- Downes, 2000, AJ, 120, 2007, 10.1086/301551 · DOI
- 10.1086/133139 · DOI
- 10.1086/133900 · DOI
- 10.1086/320802 · DOI
- 10.1086/130799 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20065741 · DOI
- Hachisu, 2006, ApJS, 167, 59, 10.1086/508063 · DOI
- Hachisu, 2007, ApJ, 662, 552, 10.1086/517600 · DOI
- Hachisu, 2008, ApJ, 687, 1236, 10.1086/591415 · DOI
- Hachisu, 2009, ApJ, 694, L103, 10.1088/0004-637X/694/2/L103 · DOI
- Hachisu, 2009, ApJ, 704, 1676, 10.1088/0004-637X/704/2/1676 · DOI
- Hachisu, 2000, ApJ, 528, L97, 10.1086/312428 · DOI
- Hachisu, 2002, The Physics of Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects, 629
- Hachisu, 2003, ApJ, 584, 1008, 10.1086/345735 · DOI
- Hachisu, 2009, RS Ophiuci (2006) and the Recurrent Nova Phenomenon, 206
- Honeycutt, 1998, ApJ, 115, 2527, 10.1086/300381 · DOI
- 10.1002/asna.19262280405 · DOI
- 10.1051/aas:1998317 · DOI
- Iben, 2003, Symbiotic Stars Probing Stellar Evolution, 177
- 10.1086/133012 · DOI
- Kafka, 2004, AJ, 128, 2420, 10.1086/424618 · DOI
- Kato, 2003, ApJ, 598, L107, 10.1086/380597 · DOI
- Kato, 2009, Variable Star Bulletin, 49, 1
- Kenyon, 1986, The Symbiotic Stars, 10.1017/CBO9780511586071 · DOI
- Kijewski, 1995, J. R. Astron. Soc. Can., 89, 43
- Kiyota, 2004, PASJ, 56, S193, 10.1093/pasj/56.sp1.S193 · DOI
- Kukarkin, 1985, General Catalog of Variable Stars
- 10.1086/128888 · DOI
- 10.1086/116242 · DOI
- Landolt, 2009, AJ, 137, 4186, 10.1088/0004-6256/137/5/4186 · DOI
- Leavitt, 1920, Harv. Ann., 84, 121
- 10.1086/186904 · DOI
- Lynch, 2008, AJ, 136, 1815, 10.1088/0004-6256/136/5/1815 · DOI
- McLaughlin, 1939, Pop. Astron., 47, 410
- McLaughlin, 1939, Pop. Astron., 47, 481
- McLaughlin, 1939, Pop. Astron., 47, 538
- Mikołajewska, 2009, RS Ophiuci (2006) and the Recurrent Nova Phenomenon, 42
- Munari, 1994, IBVS, 4005
- Nussbaumer, 1996, A&A, 307, 470
- Pagnotta, 2009, AJ, 138, 1230, 10.1088/0004-6256/138/5/1230 · DOI
- 10.1086/190940 · DOI
- Payne-Gaposhkin, 1964, The Galactic Novae
- Pecker, 1964, Ann. Astrophys., 27, 287
- Pejcha, 2009, ApJ, 701, L119, 10.1088/0004-637X/701/2/L119 · DOI
- Pickering, 1903, Ann. Harv., 48, 39
- 10.1002/asna.200811129 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02700913 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02711600 · DOI
- Schaefer, 2010, ApJS, 187, 275, 10.1088/0067-0049/187/2/275 · DOI
- Schaefer, 2010, AJ, 139, 1831, 10.1088/0004-6256/139/5/1831 · DOI
- 10.1086/160992 · DOI
- Shafter, 1997, ApJ, 487, 226, 10.1086/304609 · DOI
- 10.1086/158657 · DOI
- Skiff, 1994, IBVS, 3983
- 10.1086/154668 · DOI
- 10.1086/184642 · DOI
- Steavenson, 1926, MNRAS, 86, 365, 10.1093/mnras/86.6.365 · DOI
- Steavenson, 1927, MNRAS, 87, 568, 10.1093/mnras/87.7.568 · DOI
- 10.1086/117098 · DOI
- van den Bergh, 1987, A&AS, 70, 125
- 10.1002/asna.19282321504 · DOI
- Wachmann, 1968, Astr. Abh. Hamburger Stern., 7, 387
- Warner, 1995, Cataclysmic Variable Stars, 10.1017/CBO9780511586491 · DOI
- Whipple, 1940, Harvard Bull., 912, 5
- 10.1086/116268 · DOI
- 10.1086/170319 · DOI
- Woudt, 2009, ApJ, 706, 738, 10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/738 · DOI
- 10.1086/316526 · DOI
- 10.1002/asna.19262291705 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Astronomical and Historical Evaluation of Molnar's Solution for the Star of Bethlehem
Schaefer, B. E. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.07642
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Strope, R. J., Schaefer, B. E., & Henden, A. A.
- Affiliations
- Louisiana State University (US)
- American Association of Variable Star Observers (US)
- Venue
- The Astronomical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2010-05-20
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34-62
- ISSN
- 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-3881
- OpenAlex
- W2170761363
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 5.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Astronomical Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Keywords
- nova light curves, NOVA classification, light curve shape, quiescence, V1500 Cyg, DQ Her
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review