Cited by 33Astro and Planetary ScienceStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesSpace Satellite Systems and Control

A SERENDIPITOUS ALL SKY SURVEY FOR BRIGHT OBJECTS IN THE OUTER SOLAR SYSTEM

Open access
Brown, M. E., Bannister, M. T., Schmidt, B. P., Drake, A. J., Djorgovski, S. G., Graham, M. J., Mahabal, A., Donalek, C. +4 more·2015·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

We use seven yearʼs worth of observations from the Catalina Sky Survey and the Siding Spring Survey covering most of the northern and southern hemisphere at galactic latitudes higher than 20° to search for serendipitously imaged moving objects in the outer solar system. These slowly moving objects would appear as stationary transients in these fast cadence asteroids surveys, so we develop methods to discover objects in the outer solar system using individual observations spaced by months, rather than spaced by hours, as is typically done. While we independently discover eight known bright objects in the outer solar system, the faintest having no new objects are discovered. We find that the survey is nearly 100% efficient at detecting objects beyond 25 AU for ( in the southern hemisphere) and that the probability that there is one or more remaining outer solar system object of this brightness left to be discovered in the unsurveyed regions of the galactic plane is approximately 32%.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-6256/149/2/69

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2]2. Brown, M. E. 2008, in The Solar System Beyond Neptune, ed. M. A. Barucci et al. (Tucson, AZ: Univ. Arizona Press), 335

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, M. E., Bannister, M. T., Schmidt, B. P., Drake, A. J., Djorgovski, S. G., Graham, M. J., Mahabal, A., Donalek, C., Larson, S., Christensen, E., Beshore, E., & McNaught, R.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2015-01-19
Volume
149
Issue
2
Pages
69
ISSN
  • 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3881
OpenAlex
W2007500008
Cited by
33
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astronomical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
Keywords
outer solar system, trans-Neptunian objects, moving object detection, serendipitous discovery, Catalina Sky Survey, asteroid survey, detection efficiency, galactic latitude

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review