The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE DYNAMICS AND AFTERGLOW RADIATION OF GAMMA-RAY BURSTS. I. CONSTANT DENSITY MEDIUM
Open accessAbstract
Direct multidimensional numerical simulation is the most reliable approach for calculating the fluid dynamics and observational signatures of relativistic jets in gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). We present a two-dimensional relativistic hydrodynamic simulation of a GRB outflow during the afterglow phase, which uses the fifth-order weighted essentially nonoscillatory scheme and adaptive mesh refinement. Initially, the jet has a Lorentz factor of 20. We have followed its evolution up to 150 years. Using the hydrodynamic data, we calculate synchrotron radiation based upon standard afterglow models and compare our results with previous analytic work. We find that the sideways expansion of a relativistic GRB jet is a very slow process and previous analytic works have overestimated its rate. In our computed light curves, a very sharp jet break is seen and the postbreak light curves are steeper than analytic predictions. We find that the jet break in GRB afterglow light curves is mainly caused by the missing flux when the edge of the jet is observed. The outflow becomes nonrelativistic at the end of the Blandford–McKee phase. But it is still highly nonspherical, and it takes a rather long time for it to become a spherical Sedov–von Neumann–Taylor blast wave. We find that the late-time afterglows become increasingly flatter over time. But we disagree with the common notion that there is a sudden flattening in light curves due to the transition into the Sedov–von Neumann–Taylor solution. We have also found that there is a bump in light curves at very late times (∼1000 days) due to radiation from the counter jet. We speculate that such a counter jet bump might have already been observed in GRB 980703.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes
Blandford, R. D., & Znajek, R. L. (1977) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/179.3.433 · Cited by 5,116
Fluid dynamics of relativistic blast waves
Blandford, R. D., & McKee, C. F. (1976) · The Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/1.861619 · Cited by 1,215
Cited by
The physics of gamma-ray bursts & relativistic jets
Kumar, P., & Zhang, B. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.008 · Cited by 952
A complete reference of the analytical synchrotron external shock models of gamma-ray bursts
Gao, H., Lei, W.-H., Zou, Y.-C., Wu, X.-F., & Zhang, B. (2013) · New Astronomy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.newar.2013.10.001 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, W., & MacFadyen, A.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2009-05-28
- Volume
- 698
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1261-1272
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2053489826
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE DYNAMICS AND AFTERGLOW RADIATION OF GAMMA-RAY BURSTS. I. CONSTANT DENSITY MEDIUM. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/698/2/1261
- The paper
- Zhang, W., & MacFadyen, A. (2009). THE DYNAMICS AND AFTERGLOW RADIATION OF GAMMA-RAY BURSTS. I. CONSTANT DENSITY MEDIUM. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/698/2/1261
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.