The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE BLACK HOLE MASS, STELLAR MASS-TO-LIGHT RATIO, AND DARK HALO IN M87
Open accessAbstract
We model the dynamical structure of M87 (NGC4486) using high spatial resolution long-slit observations of stellar light in the central regions, two-dimensional stellar light kinematics out to half of the effective radius, and globular cluster velocities out to eight effective radii. We simultaneously fit for four parameters: black hole mass, dark halo core radius, dark halo circular velocity, and stellar mass-to-light ( M / L ) ratio. We find a black hole mass of 6.4(±0.5) × 10 9 M ☉ (the uncertainty is 68% confidence marginalized over the other parameters). The stellar M / L V = 6.3 ± 0.8. The best-fit dark halo core radius is 14 ± 2 kpc, assuming a cored logarithmic potential. The best-fit dark halo circular velocity is 715 ± 15 km s −1 . Our black hole mass is over a factor of 2 larger than previous stellar dynamical measures, and our derived stellar M / L ratio is two times lower than previous dynamical measures. When we do not include a dark halo, we measure a black hole mass and stellar M / L ratio that is consistent with previous measures, implying that the major difference is in the model assumptions. The stellar M / L ratio from our models is very similar to that derived from stellar population models of M87. The reason for the difference in the black hole mass is because we allow the M / L ratio to change with radius. The dark halo is degenerate with the stellar M / L ratio, which is subsequently degenerate with the black hole mass. We argue that dynamical models of galaxies that do not include the contribution from a dark halo may produce a biased result for the black hole mass. This bias is especially large for a galaxy with a shallow light profile such as M87, and may not be as severe in galaxies with steeper light profiles unless they have a large stellar population change with radius.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1996) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/177173 · Cited by 8,544
Cited by
First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole
The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, Akiyama, K., Alberdi, A., Alef, W., Asada, K., Azulay, R., Baczko, A.-K., Ball, D., Baloković, M., Barrett, J., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 · Cited by 4,205
THE BLACK HOLE MASS IN M87 FROM GEMINI/NIFS ADAPTIVE OPTICS OBSERVATIONS
Gebhardt, K., Adams, J., Richstone, D., Lauer, T. R., Faber, S. M., Gültekin, K., Murphy, J., & Tremaine, S. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/729/2/119 · Cited by 466
Self-citationGiustini, M., & Proga, D. (2019) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833810 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- Gebhardt, K., & Thomas, J.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2009-07-16
- Volume
- 700
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1690-1701
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1560414242
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE BLACK HOLE MASS, STELLAR MASS-TO-LIGHT RATIO, AND DARK HALO IN M87. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/700/2/1690
- The paper
- Gebhardt, K., & Thomas, J. (2009). THE BLACK HOLE MASS, STELLAR MASS-TO-LIGHT RATIO, AND DARK HALO IN M87. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/700/2/1690
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.