Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 173

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

STAR FORMATION IN MASSIVE CLUSTERS VIA THE WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE AND THE SPITZER GLIMPSE SURVEY

Open access
Murray, Norman, Rahman, Mubdi·2010·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We use the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) maximum entropy method foreground emission map combined with previously determined distances to giant H ii regions to measure the free–free flux at Earth and the free–free luminosity of the Galaxy. We find a total flux f ν = 54, 211 Jy and a flux from 88 sources of f ν = 36, 043 Jy. The bulk of the sources are at least marginally resolved, with mean radii ∼60 pc, electron density n e ∼ 9 cm −3 , and filling factor (over the Galactic gas disk). The total dust-corrected ionizing photon luminosity is Q = 3.2 × 10 53 ± 5.1 × 10 52 photons s −1 , in good agreement with previous estimates. We use GLIMPSE and Midcourse Space Experiment ( MSX ) 8 μm images to show that the bulk of the free–free luminosity is associated with bubbles having radii r ∼ 5–100 pc, with a mean of ∼20 pc. These bubbles are leaky, so that ionizing photons emitted inside the bubble escape and excite free–free emission beyond the bubble walls, producing WMAP sources that are larger than the 8 μm bubbles. We suggest that the WMAP sources are the counterparts of the extended low density H ii regions described by Mezger. The 18 most luminous WMAP sources emit half the total Galactic ionizing flux. These 18 sources have 4 × 10 51 s −1 ≲ Q ≲ 1.6 × 10 52 s −1 , corresponding to 6 × 10 4 M ☉ ≲ M * ≲ 2 × 10 5 M ☉ ; half to two thirds of this will be in the central massive star cluster. We convert the measurement of Q to a Galactic star formation rate (SFR) , where the errors reflect only the error in free–free luminosity. We point out, however, that our inferred is highly dependent on the exponent Γ ≈ 1.35 of the high-mass end of the stellar initial mass function. For 1.21 < Γ < 1.5, we find . We also determine a SFR of 0.14 M ☉ yr −1 for the Large Magellanic Cloud and 0.015 M ☉ yr −1 for the Small Magellanic Cloud.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/709/1/424

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 173

Metadata

Authors
Murray, N., & Rahman, M.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2009-12-31
Volume
709
Issue
1
Pages
424-435
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2018264656
Cited by
173
References
0
FWCI
6.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: STAR FORMATION IN MASSIVE CLUSTERS VIA THE WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE AND THE SPITZER GLIMPSE SURVEY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/709/1/424
The paper
Murray, N., & Rahman, M. (2010). STAR FORMATION IN MASSIVE CLUSTERS VIA THE WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE AND THE SPITZER GLIMPSE SURVEY. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/709/1/424

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.