The DOI matches its Crossref record.
STAR FORMATION IN MASSIVE CLUSTERS VIA THE WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE AND THE SPITZER GLIMPSE SURVEY
Open accessAbstract
We use the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) maximum entropy method foreground emission map combined with previously determined distances to giant H ii regions to measure the free–free flux at Earth and the free–free luminosity of the Galaxy. We find a total flux f ν = 54, 211 Jy and a flux from 88 sources of f ν = 36, 043 Jy. The bulk of the sources are at least marginally resolved, with mean radii ∼60 pc, electron density n e ∼ 9 cm −3 , and filling factor (over the Galactic gas disk). The total dust-corrected ionizing photon luminosity is Q = 3.2 × 10 53 ± 5.1 × 10 52 photons s −1 , in good agreement with previous estimates. We use GLIMPSE and Midcourse Space Experiment ( MSX ) 8 μm images to show that the bulk of the free–free luminosity is associated with bubbles having radii r ∼ 5–100 pc, with a mean of ∼20 pc. These bubbles are leaky, so that ionizing photons emitted inside the bubble escape and excite free–free emission beyond the bubble walls, producing WMAP sources that are larger than the 8 μm bubbles. We suggest that the WMAP sources are the counterparts of the extended low density H ii regions described by Mezger. The 18 most luminous WMAP sources emit half the total Galactic ionizing flux. These 18 sources have 4 × 10 51 s −1 ≲ Q ≲ 1.6 × 10 52 s −1 , corresponding to 6 × 10 4 M ☉ ≲ M * ≲ 2 × 10 5 M ☉ ; half to two thirds of this will be in the central massive star cluster. We convert the measurement of Q to a Galactic star formation rate (SFR) , where the errors reflect only the error in free–free luminosity. We point out, however, that our inferred is highly dependent on the exponent Γ ≈ 1.35 of the high-mass end of the stellar initial mass function. For 1.21 < Γ < 1.5, we find . We also determine a SFR of 0.14 M ☉ yr −1 for the Large Magellanic Cloud and 0.015 M ☉ yr −1 for the Small Magellanic Cloud.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Star Formation in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies
Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 · Cited by 2,902
“The star formation rate of the MW has been estimated from counting H II regions, which can be seen across the MW and extrapolating to lower mass stars (Mezger 1987; McKee &Williams 1997; Murray & Rahman 2010).”
MethodBesla, G., Kallivayalil, N., Hernquist, L., van der Marel, R. P., Cox, T. J., & Kereš, D. (2012) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20466.x · Cited by 359
Variations in the Galactic star formation rate and density thresholds for star formation
Longmore, S. N., Bally, J., Testi, L., Purcell, C. R., Walsh, A. J., Bressert, E., Pestalozzi, M., Molinari, S., Ott, J., Cortese, L., et al. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sts376 · Cited by 357
Self-citationTOWARD A UNIFICATION OF STAR FORMATION RATE DETERMINATIONS IN THE MILKY WAY AND OTHER GALAXIES
Chomiuk, L., & Povich, M. S. (2011) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/142/6/197 · Cited by 346
MODELING THE METALLICITY DISTRIBUTION OF GLOBULAR CLUSTERS
Muratov, A. L., & Gnedin, O. Y. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/718/2/1266 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Murray, N., & Rahman, M.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2009-12-31
- Volume
- 709
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 424-435
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2018264656
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: STAR FORMATION IN MASSIVE CLUSTERS VIA THE WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE AND THE SPITZER GLIMPSE SURVEY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/709/1/424
- The paper
- Murray, N., & Rahman, M. (2010). STAR FORMATION IN MASSIVE CLUSTERS VIA THE WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE AND THE SPITZER GLIMPSE SURVEY. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/709/1/424
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.