The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RESOLVING THE ξ BOO BINARY WITH CHANDRA, AND REVEALING THE SPECTRAL TYPE DEPENDENCE OF THE CORONAL “FIP EFFECT”
Open accessAbstract
On 2008 May 2, Chandra observed the X-ray spectrum of ξ Boo (G8 V+K4 V), resolving the binary for the first time in X-rays and allowing the coronae of the two stars to be studied separately. With the contributions of ξ Boo A and B to the system's total X-ray emission now observationally established (88.5% and 11.5%, respectively), consideration of mass loss measurements for GK dwarfs of various activity levels (including one for ξ Boo) leads to the surprising conclusion that ξ Boo B may dominate the wind from the binary, with ξ Boo A's wind being very weak despite its active corona. Emission measure (EM) distributions and coronal abundances are computed for both stars and compared with Chandra measurements of other moderately active stars with G8-K5 spectral types, all of which exhibit a narrow peak in EM near log T = 6.6, indicating that the coronal heating process in these stars has a strong preference for this temperature. As is the case for the Sun and many other stars, our sample of stars shows coronal abundance anomalies dependent on the first ionization potential (FIP) of the element. We see no dependence of the degree of "FIP effect" on activity, but there is a dependence on spectral type, a correlation that becomes more convincing when moderately active main-sequence stars with a broader range of spectral types are considered. This clear dependence of coronal abundances on spectral type weakens if the stellar sample is allowed to be contaminated by evolved stars, interacting binaries, or extremely active stars with log L X >29, explaining why this correlation has not been recognized in the past.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Chemical Composition of the Sun
Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. (2009) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 · Cited by 9,346
Grevesse, N., & Sauval, A. J. (1998) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1023/a:1005161325181 · Cited by 3,480
Rotation, convection, and magnetic activity in lower main-sequence stars
Noyes, R. W., Hartmann, L. W., Baliunas, S. L., Duncan, D. K., & Vaughan, A. H. (1984) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/161945 · Cited by 1,708
Mazzotta, P., Mazzitelli, G., Colafrancesco, S., & Vittorio, N. (1998) · Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series · doi:10.1051/aas:1998330 · Cited by 957
New Mass-Loss Measurements from Astrospheric Lyα Absorption
Wood, B. E., Müller, H.-R., Zank, G. P., Linsky, J. L., & Redfield, S. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/432716 · Cited by 467 · cited 6×
“As mentioned in Section 1, ξ Boo has a measured wind strength of 5 Ṁ , but the measurement is for the combined wind of the system, and there is no way to tell from the observations the contribution of each star to this total (Wood et al. 2005a).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationX-ray astronomy of stellar coronae
G�del, M. (2004) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-004-0023-2 · Cited by 413
S$\mathsf{^4}$N: A spectroscopic survey of stars in the solar neighborhood: The Nearest 15 pc
Allende Prieto, C., Barklem, P. S., Lambert, D. L., & Cunha, K. (2004) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20035801 · Cited by 336
The X‐Ray Sun in Time: A Study of the Long‐Term Evolution of Coronae of Solar‐Type Stars
Gudel, M., Guinan, E. F., & Skinner, S. L. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304264 · Cited by 323
Wood, B. E., Redfield, S., Linsky, J. L., Muller, H., & Zank, G. P. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/430523 · Cited by 283
Self-citationToroidal versus poloidal magnetic fields in Sun-like stars: a rotation threshold
Petit, P., Dintrans, B., Solanki, S. K., Donati, J.-F., Aurire, M., Lignires, F., Morin, J., Paletou, F., Ramirez, J., Catala, C., et al. (2008) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13411.x · Cited by 277
Cited by
TESTING A PREDICTIVE THEORETICAL MODEL FOR THE MASS LOSS RATES OF COOL STARS
Cranmer, S. R., & Saar, S. H. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/741/1/54 · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- Wood, B. E., & Linsky, J. L.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2010-06-23
- Volume
- 717
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1279-1290
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2053342757
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 2.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RESOLVING THE ξ BOO BINARY WITH CHANDRA, AND REVEALING THE SPECTRAL TYPE DEPENDENCE OF THE CORONAL “FIP EFFECT”. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/717/2/1279
- The paper
- Wood, B. E., & Linsky, J. L. (2010). RESOLVING THE ξ BOO BINARY WITH CHANDRA, AND REVEALING THE SPECTRAL TYPE DEPENDENCE OF THE CORONAL “FIP EFFECT”. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/717/2/1279
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.