Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 330

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

OBSERVATIONS OF MASS LOSS FROM THE TRANSITING EXOPLANET HD 209458b

Open access
Linsky, Jeffrey L., Yang, Hao, France, Kevin, Froning, Cynthia S., Green, James C., Stocke, John T., Osterman, Steven N.·2010·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Using the new Cosmic Origins Spectrograph on the Hubble Space Telescope , we obtained moderate-resolution, high signal/noise ultraviolet spectra of HD 209458 and its exoplanet HD 209458b during transit, both orbital quadratures, and secondary eclipse. We compare transit spectra with spectra obtained at non-transit phases to identify spectral features due to the exoplanet's expanding atmosphere. We find that the mean flux decreased by 7.8% ± 1.3% for the C ii 1334.5323 Å and 1335.6854 Å lines and by 8.2% ± 1.4% for the Si iii 1206.500 Å line during transit compared to non-transit times in the velocity interval −50 to +50 km s −1 . Comparison of the C ii and Si iii line depths and transit/non-transit line ratios shows deeper absorption features near −10 and +15 km s −1 and less certain features near −40 and +30–70 km s −1 , but future observations are needed to verify this first detection of velocity structure in the expanding atmosphere of an exoplanet. Our results for the C ii lines and the non-detection of Si iv 1394.76 Å absorption are in agreement with Vidal-Madjar et al., but we find absorption during transit in the Si iii line contrary to the earlier result. The 8% ± 1% obscuration of the star during transit is far larger than the 1.5% obscuration by the exoplanet's disk. Absorption during transit at velocities between −50 and +50 km s −1 in the C ii and Si iii lines requires high-velocity ion absorbers. Assuming hydrodynamic model values for the gas temperature and outflow velocity at the limb of the outflow as seen in the C ii lines, we find mass-loss rates in the range (8–40) × 10 10 g s −1 . These rates assume that the carbon abundance is solar, which is not the case for the giant planets in the solar system. Our mass-loss rate estimate is consistent with theoretical hydrodynamic models that include metals in the outflowing gas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/717/2/1291

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 330

Metadata

Authors
Linsky, J. L., Yang, H., France, K., Froning, C. S., Green, J. C., Stocke, J. T., & Osterman, S. N.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2010-06-23
Volume
717
Issue
2
Pages
1291-1299
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2001375089
Cited by
330
References
2
FWCI
15.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: OBSERVATIONS OF MASS LOSS FROM THE TRANSITING EXOPLANET HD 209458b. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/717/2/1291
The paper
Linsky, J. L., Yang, H., France, K., Froning, C. S., Green, J. C., Stocke, J. T., & Osterman, S. N. (2010). OBSERVATIONS OF MASS LOSS FROM THE TRANSITING EXOPLANET HD 209458b. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/717/2/1291

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.