Cited by 72Astronomy and Astrophysical ResearchStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

WAVELENGTH CALIBRATION OF THE VLT-UVES SPECTROGRAPH

Open access
Whitmore, Jonathan B., Murphy, Michael T., Griest, Kim·2010·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We attempt to measure possible miscalibration of the wavelength scale of the VLT-UVES spectrograph. We take spectra of QSO HE0515-4414 through the UVES iodine cell which contains thousands of well-calibrated iodine lines and compare these lines to the wavelength scale from the standard thorium–argon pipeline calibration. Analyzing three exposures of this z = 1.71 QSO, we find two distinct types of calibration shifts needed to correct the Th/Ar wavelength scale. First, there is an overall average velocity shift of between 100 m s −1 and 500 m s −1 depending upon the exposure. Second, within a given exposure, we find intra-order velocity distortions of 100 m s −1 up to more than 200 m s −1 . These calibration errors are similar to, but smaller than, those found earlier in the Keck HIRES spectrometer. We discuss the possible origins of these two types of miscalibration. We also explore the implications of these calibration errors on the systematic error in measurements of , the change in the fine-structure constant derived from measurement of the relative redshifts of absorption lines in QSO absorption systems. The overall average, exposure-dependent shifts should be less relevant for fine-structure work, but the intra-order shifts have the potential to affect these results. Using either our measured calibration offsets or a Gaussian model with sigma of around 90 m s −1 , Monte Carlo mock experiments find errors in of between 1 × 10 −6 N −1/2 sys and 3 × 10 −6 N −1/2 sys , where N sys is the number of systems used and the range is due to dependence on how many metallic absorption lines in each system are compared.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/723/1/89

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 72

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Konacki, M. 2009, in IAU Symp. 253, Transiting Planets, ed. F. Pont, D. D. Sasselov, & M. J. Holman (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), 141
  2. Varshalovich, D. A., Potekhin, A. Y., & Ivanchik, A. V. 2000, in AIP Conf. 506, X-Ray and Inner-Shell Processes, ed. R. W. Dunford et al. (Argonne, IL: Argonne National Laboratory)

Authors
Whitmore, J. B., Murphy, M. T., & Griest, K.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2010-10-07
Volume
723
Issue
1
Pages
89-99
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2132508908
Cited by
72
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
wavelength calibration, iodine cell, systematic errors, fine-structure constant variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review