The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE BLACK HOLE MASS DISTRIBUTION IN THE GALAXY
Open accessAbstract
We use dynamical mass measurements of 16 black holes in transient low-mass X-ray binaries to infer the stellar black hole mass distribution in the parent population. We find that the observations are best described by a narrow mass distribution at 7.8 ± 1.2 M ☉ . We identify a selection effect related to the choice of targets for optical follow-ups that results in a flux-limited sample. We demonstrate, however, that this selection effect does not introduce a bias in the observed distribution and cannot explain the absence of black holes in the 2–5 M ☉ mass range. On the high-mass end, we argue that the rapid decline in the inferred distribution may be the result of the particular evolutionary channel followed by low-mass X-ray binaries. This is consistent with the presence of high-mass black holes in the persistent, high-mass X-ray binary sources. If the paucity of low-mass black holes is caused by a sudden decrease of the supernova explosion energy with increasing progenitor mass, this would have observable implications for ongoing transient surveys that target core-collapse supernovae. Our results also have significant implications for the calculation of event rates from the coalescence of black hole binaries for gravitational wave detectors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abernathy, M. R., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R. X., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.241103 · Cited by 3,435
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab3800 · Cited by 895
Observation of Gravitational Waves from Two Neutron Star-Black Hole Coalescences
Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, A., Adams, C., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., et al. (2021) · Institutional Repository of Leibniz Universität Hannover (Leibniz Universität Hannover) · doi:10.15488/11385 · Cited by 609
The Evolution of Compact Binary Star Systems
Postnov, K. A., & Yungelson, L. R. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-3 · Cited by 486
No large population of unbound or wide-orbit Jupiter-mass planets
Mróz, P., Udalski, A., Skowron, J., Poleski, R., Kozłowski, S., Szymański, M. K., Soszyński, I., Wyrzykowski, Ł., Pietrukowicz, P., Ulaczyk, K., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23276 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Özel, F., Psaltis, D., Narayan, R., & McClintock, J. E.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2010-12-02
- Volume
- 725
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1918-1927
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1989323319
- Cited by
- 704
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE BLACK HOLE MASS DISTRIBUTION IN THE GALAXY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/725/2/1918
- The paper
- Özel, F., Psaltis, D., Narayan, R., & McClintock, J. E. (2010). THE BLACK HOLE MASS DISTRIBUTION IN THE GALAXY. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/725/2/1918
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.