Cited by 104Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesNuclear physics research studiesGamma-ray bursts and supernovae

HEAVY ELEMENT NUCLEOSYNTHESIS IN THE BRIGHTEST GALACTIC ASYMPTOTIC GIANT BRANCH STARS

Open access
Karakas, Amanda I., García-Hernández, D. A., Lugaro, Maria·2012·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We present updated calculations of stellar evolutionary sequences and detailed nucleosynthesis predictions for the brightest asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars in the Galaxy with masses between 5 M ☉ and 9 M ☉ , with an initial metallicity of Z = 0.02 ([Fe/H] = 0.14). In our previous studies we used the Vassiliadis & Wood mass-loss rate, which stays low until the pulsation period reaches 500 days after which point a superwind begins. Vassiliadis & Wood noted that for stars over 2.5 M ☉ the superwind should be delayed until P ≈ 750 days at 5 M ☉ . We calculate evolutionary sequences where we delay the onset of the superwind to pulsation periods of P ≈ 700–800 days in models of M = 5, 6, and 7 M ☉ . Post-processing nucleosynthesis calculations show that the 6 and 7 M ☉ models produce the most Rb, with [Rb/Fe] ≈1 dex, close to the average of most of the Galactic Rb-rich stars ([Rb/Fe] ≈1.4 ± 0.8 dex). Changing the rate of the 22 Ne +α reactions results in variations of [Rb/Fe] as large as 0.5 dex in models with a delayed superwind. The largest enrichment in heavy elements is found for models that adopt the NACRE rate of the 22 Ne(α, n ) 25 Mg reaction. Using this rate allows us to best match the composition of most of the Rb-rich stars. A synthetic evolution algorithm is then used to remove the remaining envelope resulting in final [Rb/Fe] of ≈1.4 dex although with C/O ratios >1. We conclude that delaying the superwind may account for the large Rb overabundances observed in the brightest metal-rich AGB stars.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/751/1/8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HBB will act to prevent the formation of C-rich luminous AGB stars at the highest metallicities.

    “Finally, HBB will act to prevent the formation of C-rich luminous AGB stars at the highest metallicities (e.g., Karakas et al. 2012)”
  • The 22Ne(α,n)25Mg reaction is the dominant neutron source in intermediate-mass AGB stars.

    “It is the dominant neutron-producing reaction in the He and C-burning regions of massive stars (The, El Eid, & Meyer 2007; Heil et al. 2008; Pignatari et al. 2010) and the dominant neutron source in intermediate-mass AGB stars (Garc´ ıaHern´ andez et al. 2006; Karakas et al. 2012).”
  • Phosphorus and Sc can also be produced in small quantities by AGB stars as a consequence of neutron captures in the He intershell.

    “Phosphorus and Sc can also be produced in small quantities by AGB stars as a consequence of neutron captures in the He intershell (Smith et al. 1987; Karakas et al. 2012).”
  • The only s-process calculations currently published for super-AGB stars are for a single 9 M⊙, Z = 0.02 model in Karakas et al. (2012) and only for a limited nuclear network up to Mo.

    “The only s -process calculations currently published are for a single 9 M ⊙ , Z = 0 . 02 model in Karakas et al. (2012) and only for a limited nuclear network up to Mo.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 83 · Cited by 104

Authors
Karakas, A. I., García-Hernández, D. A., & Lugaro, M.
Affiliations
  • Mount Stromlo Observatory (AU)
  • Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (ES)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Karakas, Amanda I.
  • García-Hernández, D. A.
  • Lugaro, Maria
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2012-04-27
Volume
751
Issue
1
Pages
8
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2170802166
Cited by
104
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Nuclear physics research studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Keywords
asymptotic giant branch stars, heavy element nucleosynthesis, superwind, stellar mass loss, 22Ne(α,n)25Mg reaction, galactic chemical evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review