Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 163

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

SUBMILLIMETER FOLLOW-UP OF WISE-SELECTED HYPERLUMINOUS GALAXIES

Open access
Wu, Jingwen, Tsai, Chao-Wei, Sayers, Jack, Benford, Dominic, Bridge, Carrie, Blain, Andrew, Eisenhardt, Peter R. M., Stern, Daniel, Petty, Sara, Assef, Roberto, Bussmann, Shane, Comerford, Julia M., Cutri, Roc, Evans, Neal J., Griffith, Roger, Jarrett, Thomas, Lake, Sean, Lonsdale, Carol, Rho, Jeonghee, Stanford, S. Adam, Weiner, Benjamin, Wright, Edward L., Yan, Lin·2012·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We have used the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory (CSO) to follow-up a sample of Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer ( WISE ) selected, hyperluminous galaxies, the so-called W1W2-dropout galaxies. This is a rare (∼1000 all-sky) population of galaxies at high redshift (peaks at z = 2–3), which are faint or undetected by WISE at 3.4 and 4.6 μm, yet are clearly detected at 12 and 22 μm. The optical spectra of most of these galaxies show significant active galactic nucleus activity. We observed 14 high-redshift ( z > 1.7) W1W2-dropout galaxies with SHARC-II at 350–850 μm, with nine detections, and observed 18 with Bolocam at 1.1 mm, with five detections. Warm Spitzer follow-up of 25 targets at 3.6 and 4.5 μm, as well as optical spectra of 12 targets, are also presented in the paper. Combining WISE data with observations from warm Spitzer and CSO, we constructed their mid-IR to millimeter spectral energy distributions (SEDs). These SEDs have a consistent shape, showing significantly higher mid-IR to submillimeter ratios than other galaxy templates, suggesting a hotter dust temperature. We estimate their dust temperatures to be 60–120 K using a single-temperature model. Their infrared luminosities are well over 10 13 L ☉ . These SEDs are not well fitted with existing galaxy templates, suggesting they are a new population with very high luminosity and hot dust. They are likely among the most luminous galaxies in the universe. We argue that they are extreme cases of luminous, hot dust-obscured galaxies (DOGs), possibly representing a short evolutionary phase during galaxy merging and evolution. A better understanding of their long-wavelength properties needs ALMA as well as Herschel data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/756/1/96

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 163

Metadata

Authors
Wu, J., Tsai, C.-W., Sayers, J., Benford, D., Bridge, C., Blain, A., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Stern, D., Petty, S., Assef, R., Bussmann, S., Comerford, J. M., Cutri, R., Evans, N. J., Griffith, R., Jarrett, T., Lake, S., Lonsdale, C., Rho, J., Stanford, S. A., Weiner, B., Wright, E. L., & Yan, L.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2012-08-20
Volume
756
Issue
1
Pages
96
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2109558973
Cited by
163
References
0
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SUBMILLIMETER FOLLOW-UP OF WISE-SELECTED HYPERLUMINOUS GALAXIES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/756/1/96
The paper
Wu, J., Tsai, C.-W., Sayers, J., Benford, D., Bridge, C., Blain, A., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Stern, D., Petty, S., Assef, R., Bussmann, S., Comerford, J. M., Cutri, R., Evans, N. J., Griffith, R., Jarrett, T., Lake, S., Lonsdale, C., Rho, J., . . . Yan, L. (2012). SUBMILLIMETER FOLLOW-UP OF WISE-SELECTED HYPERLUMINOUS GALAXIES. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/756/1/96

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.