Cited by 38Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

MAGNESIUM ISOTOPE RATIOS IN ω CENTAURI RED GIANTS

Open access
Da Costa, G. S., Norris, John E., Yong, David·2013·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We have used the high-resolution observations obtained at the Anglo-Australian Telescope with Ultra-High Resolution Facility ( R ∼ 100,000) and at Gemini-S with b-HROS ( R ∼ 150,000) to determine magnesium isotope ratios for seven ω Cen red giants that cover a range in iron abundance from [Fe/H] = −1.78 to −0.78 dex, and for two red giants in M4 (NGC 6121). The ω Cen stars sample both the "primordial" (i.e., O-rich, Na- and Al-poor) and the "extreme" (O-depleted, Na- and Al-rich) populations in the cluster. The primordial population stars in both ω Cen and M4 show ( 25 Mg, 26 Mg)/ 24 Mg isotopic ratios that are consistent with those found for the primordial population in other globular clusters with similar [Fe/H] values. The isotopic ratios for the ω Cen extreme stars are also consistent with those for extreme population stars in other clusters. The results for the extreme population stars studied indicate that the 26 Mg/ 24 Mg ratio is highest at intermediate metallicities ([Fe/H] < −1.4 dex), and for the highest [Al/Fe] values. Further, the relative abundance of 26 Mg in the extreme population stars is notably higher than that of 25 Mg, in contrast to model predictions. The 25 Mg/ 24 Mg isotopic ratio in fact does not show any obvious dependence on either [Fe/H] or [Al/Fe] nor, intriguingly, any obvious difference between the primordial and extreme population stars.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/769/1/8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In GCs with Mg and Al variations, 24Mg is depleted at the expense of 26Mg with essentially no star-to-star variations in 25Mg.

    “For those globular clusters that do show stars with variations in Mg and Al we find that 24 Mgis depleted at the expense of 26 Mgwith essentially no star-to-star variations in 25 Mg (e.g., Da Costa et al. 2013).”
  • In ω Cen, at all metallicities stars show approximately solar ratios for 25Mg/Mg ≈ 0.1.

    “If we focus just on ω Cen, then at all metallicities the stars show approximately solar ratios for 25 Mg/Mg ≈ 0 . 1 (e.g., Figure 9 in Da Costa et al. 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Da Costa, G. S., Norris, J. E., & Yong, D.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2013-04-30
Volume
769
Issue
1
Pages
8
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2014461261
Cited by
38
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
magnesium isotopes, Omega Centauri, red giants, globular clusters, M4, NGC 6121, oxygen depletion, isotope fractionation, stellar nucleosynthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review