Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 462

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ANDROMEDA'S DUST

Open access
Draine, B. T., Aniano, G., Krause, Oliver, Groves, Brent, Sandstrom, Karin, Braun, Robert, Leroy, Adam, Klaas, Ulrich, Linz, Hendrik, Rix, Hans-Walter, Schinnerer, Eva, Schmiedeke, Anika, Walter, Fabian·2013·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Spitzer Space Telescope and Herschel Space Observatory imaging of M31 is used, with a physical dust model, to construct maps of dust surface density, dust-to-gas ratio, starlight heating intensity, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) abundance, out to R ≈ 25 kpc. The global dust mass is M d = 5.4 × 10 7 M ☉ , the global dust/H mass ratio is M d / M H = 0.0081, and the global PAH abundance is 〈 q PAH 〉 = 0.039. The dust surface density has an inner ring at R = 5.6 kpc, a maximum at R = 11.2 kpc, and an outer ring at R ≈ 15.1 kpc. The dust/gas ratio varies from M d / M H ≈ 0.026 at the center to ∼0.0027 at R ≈ 25 kpc. From the dust/gas ratio, we estimate the interstellar medium metallicity to vary by a factor ∼10, from Z / Z ☉ ≈ 3 at R = 0 to ∼0.3 at R = 25 kpc. The dust heating rate parameter 〈 U 〉 peaks at the center, with 〈 U 〉 ≈ 35, declining to 〈 U 〉 ≈ 0.25 at R = 20 kpc. Within the central kiloparsec, the starlight heating intensity inferred from the dust modeling is close to what is estimated from the stars in the bulge. The PAH abundance reaches a peak q PAH ≈ 0.045 at R ≈ 11.2 kpc. When allowance is made for the different spectrum of the bulge stars, q PAH for the dust in the central kiloparsec is similar to the overall value of q PAH in the disk. The silicate–graphite–PAH dust model used here is generally able to reproduce the observed dust spectral energy distribution across M31, but overpredicts 500 μm emission at R ≈ 2–6 kpc, suggesting that at R = 2–6 kpc, the dust opacity varies more steeply with frequency (with β ≈ 2.3 between 200 and 600 μm) than in the model.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/780/2/172

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Cited by

See all 462

Metadata

Authors
Draine, B. T., Aniano, G., Krause, O., Groves, B., Sandstrom, K., Braun, R., Leroy, A., Klaas, U., Linz, H., Rix, H.-W., Schinnerer, E., Schmiedeke, A., & Walter, F.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2013-12-23
Volume
780
Issue
2
Pages
172
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2027604185
Cited by
462
References
49
FWCI
10.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ANDROMEDA'S DUST. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/780/2/172
The paper
Draine, B. T., Aniano, G., Krause, O., Groves, B., Sandstrom, K., Braun, R., Leroy, A., Klaas, U., Linz, H., Rix, H.-W., Schinnerer, E., Schmiedeke, A., & Walter, F. (2013). ANDROMEDA'S DUST. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/780/2/172

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.