The DOI matches its Crossref record; 106 of the 106 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A CONTINUUM OF H- TO He-RICH TIDAL DISRUPTION CANDIDATES WITH A PREFERENCE FOR E+A GALAXIES
Open accessAbstract
We present the results of a Palomar Transient Factory (PTF) archival search for blue transients that lie in the magnitude range between "normal" core-collapse and superluminous supernovae (i.e., with −21 ⩽ M R (peak) ⩽ − 19). Of the six events found after excluding all interacting Type IIn and Ia-CSM supernovae, three (PTF09ge, 09axc, and 09djl) are coincident with the centers of their hosts, one (10iam) is offset from the center, and a precise offset cannot be determined for two (10nuj and 11glr). All the central events have similar rise times to the He-rich tidal disruption candidate PS1-10jh, and the event with the best-sampled light curve also has similar colors and power-law decay. Spectroscopically, PTF09ge is He-rich, while PTF09axc and 09djl display broad hydrogen features around peak magnitude. All three central events are in low star formation hosts, two of which are E+A galaxies. Our spectrum of the host of PS1-10jh displays similar properties. PTF10iam, the one offset event, is different photometrically and spectroscopically from the central events, and its host displays a higher star formation rate. Finding no obvious evidence for ongoing galactic nuclei activity or recent star formation, we conclude that the three central transients likely arise from the tidal disruption of a star by a supermassive black hole. We compare the spectra of these events to tidal disruption candidates from the literature and find that all of these objects can be unified on a continuous scale of spectral properties. The accumulated evidence of this expanded sample strongly supports a tidal disruption origin for this class of nuclear transients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003
Bruzual, G., & Charlot, S. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x · Cited by 10,500
The Luminosity Function and Stellar Evolution.
Salpeter, E. E. (1955) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/145971 · Cited by 8,697
MEASURING REDDENING WITH SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY STELLAR SPECTRA AND RECALIBRATING SFD
Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/737/2/103 · Cited by 7,531
STAR FORMATION IN GALAXIES ALONG THE HUBBLE SEQUENCE
Kennicutt, R. C. (1998) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 · Cited by 6,578
Classification parameters for the emission-line spectra of extragalactic objects
Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., & Terlevich, R. (1981) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/130766 · Cited by 5,132
Coevolution (Or Not) of Supermassive Black Holes and Host Galaxies
Kormendy, J., & Ho, L. C. (2013) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101811 · Cited by 4,196
The Swift Gamma‐Ray Burst Mission
Gehrels, N., Chincarini, G., Giommi, P., Mason, K. O., Nousek, J. A., Wells, A. A., White, N. E., Barthelmy, S. D., Burrows, D. N., Cominsky, L. R., et al. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/422091 · Cited by 4,154
Self-citationStar Formation in Galaxies Along the Hubble Sequence
Kennicutt, R. C., & Words, K. (1998) · Cited by 3,712
Cappellari, M., & Emsellem, E. (2004) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/381875 · Cited by 2,219
Monet, D. G., Levine, S. E., Canzian, B., Ables, H. D., Bird, A. R., Dahn, C. C., Guetter, H. H., Harris, H. C., Henden, A. A., Leggett, S. K., et al. (2003) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/345888 · Cited by 2,117
Cited by
Paxton, B., Schwab, J., Bauer, E. B., Bildsten, L., Blinnikov, S., Duffell, P., Farmer, R., Goldberg, J. A., Marchant, P., Sorokina, E., et al. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aaa5a8 · Cited by 2,121
The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy – an overview
(2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw641 · Cited by 1,019
Gezari, S. (2021) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-111720-030029 · Cited by 425
Rates of stellar tidal disruption as probes of the supermassive black hole mass function
Stone, N. C., & Metzger, B. D. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2281 · Cited by 384
DISK FORMATION VERSUS DISK ACCRETION—WHAT POWERS TIDAL DISRUPTION EVENTS?
Piran, T., Svirski, G., Krolik, J., Cheng, R. M., & Shiokawa, H. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/806/2/164 · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- Arcavi, I., Gal-Yam, A., Sullivan, M., Pan, Y.-C., Cenko, S. B., Horesh, A., Ofek, E. O., De Cia, A., Yan, L., Yang, C.-W., Howell, D. A., Tal, D., Kulkarni, S. R., Tendulkar, S. P., Tang, S., Xu, D., Sternberg, A., Cohen, J. G., Bloom, J. S., Nugent, P. E., Kasliwal, M. M., Perley, D. A., Quimby, R. M., Miller, A. A., Theissen, C. A., & Laher, R. R.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2014-09-03
- Volume
- 793
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2134223818
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 106
- FWCI
- 23.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A CONTINUUM OF H- TO He-RICH TIDAL DISRUPTION CANDIDATES WITH A PREFERENCE FOR E+A GALAXIES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/793/1/38
- The paper
- Arcavi, I., Gal-Yam, A., Sullivan, M., Pan, Y.-C., Cenko, S. B., Horesh, A., Ofek, E. O., De Cia, A., Yan, L., Yang, C.-W., Howell, D. A., Tal, D., Kulkarni, S. R., Tendulkar, S. P., Tang, S., Xu, D., Sternberg, A., Cohen, J. G., Bloom, J. S., . . . Laher, R. R. (2014). A CONTINUUM OF H- TO He-RICH TIDAL DISRUPTION CANDIDATES WITH A PREFERENCE FOR E+A GALAXIES. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/793/1/38
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.