The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE 1% CONCORDANCE HUBBLE CONSTANT
Open accessAbstract
The determination of the Hubble constant has been a central goal in observational astrophysics for nearly a hundred years. Extraordinary progress has occurred in recent years on two fronts: the cosmic distance ladder measurements at low redshift and cosmic microwave background (CMB) measurements at high redshift. The CMB is used to predict the current expansion rate through a best-fit cosmological model. Complementary progress has been made with baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements at relatively low redshifts. While BAO data do not independently determine a Hubble constant, they are important for constraints on possible solutions and checks on cosmic consistency. A precise determination of the Hubble constant is of great value, but it is more important to compare the high and low redshift measurements to test our cosmological model. Significant tension would suggest either uncertainties not accounted for in the experimental estimates or the discovery of new physics beyond the standard model of cosmology. In this paper we examine in detail the tension between the CMB, BAO, and cosmic distance ladder data sets. We find that these measurements are consistent within reasonable statistical expectations and we combine them to determine a best-fit Hubble constant of 69.6 ± 0.7 km s −1 Mpc −1 . This value is based upon WMAP 9+SPT+ACT+6dFGS+BOSS/DR11+ H 0 /Riess; we explore alternate data combinations in the text. The combined data constrain the Hubble constant to 1%, with no compelling evidence for new physics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gorski, K. M., Hivon, E., Banday, A. J., Wandelt, B. D., Hansen, F. K., Reinecke, M., & Bartelmann, M. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/427976 · Cited by 5,958
NINE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE ( WMAP ) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETER RESULTS
Hinshaw, G., Larson, D., Komatsu, E., Spergel, D. N., Bennett, C. L., Dunkley, J., Nolta, M. R., Halpern, M., Hill, R. S., Odegard, N., et al. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19 · Cited by 5,121
Self-citationLewis, A., Challinor, A., & Lasenby, A. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309179 · Cited by 4,920
Eisenstein, D. J., Zehavi, I., Hogg, D. W., Scoccimarro, R., Blanton, M. R., Nichol, R. C., Scranton, R., Seo, H., Tegmark, M., Zheng, Z., et al. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/466512 · Cited by 4,629
Final Results from the Hubble Space Telescope Key Project to Measure the Hubble Constant
Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Gibson, B. K., Ferrarese, L., Kelson, D. D., Sakai, S., Mould, J. R., Kennicutt, Jr., Ford, H. C., Graham, J. A., et al. (2001) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/320638 · Cited by 3,298
Beutler, F., Blake, C., Colless, M., Jones, D. H., Staveley-Smith, L., Campbell, L., Parker, Q., Saunders, W., & Watson, F. (2011) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19250.x · Cited by 2,590
A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae
Hubble, E. (1929) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.15.3.168 · Cited by 2,538
NINE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE ( WMAP ) OBSERVATIONS: FINAL MAPS AND RESULTS
Bennett, C. L., Larson, D., Weiland, J. L., Jarosik, N., Hinshaw, G., Odegard, N., Smith, K. M., Hill, R. S., Gold, B., Halpern, M., et al. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/20 · Cited by 2,408
Self-citationBaryonic Features in the Matter Transfer Function
Eisenstein, D. J., & Hu, W. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305424 · Cited by 2,239
Anderson, L., Aubourg, É., Bailey, S., Beutler, F., Bhardwaj, V., Blanton, M., Bolton, A. S., Brinkmann, J., Brownstein, J. R., Burden, A., et al. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu523 · Cited by 1,842
Cited by
Alam, S., Ata, M., Bailey, S., Beutler, F., Bizyaev, D., Blazek, J. A., Bolton, A. S., Brownstein, J. R., Burden, A., Chuang, C.-H., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx721 · Cited by 3,056
Quantifying discordance in the 2015 Planck CMB spectrum
Addison, G. E., Huang, Y., Watts, D. J., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., & Weiland, J. L. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/818/2/132 · Cited by 235
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennett, C. L., Larson, D., Weiland, J. L., & Hinshaw, G.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2014-10-01
- Volume
- 794
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2166156153
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 14.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE 1% CONCORDANCE HUBBLE CONSTANT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/794/2/135
- The paper
- Bennett, C. L., Larson, D., Weiland, J. L., & Hinshaw, G. (2014). THE 1% CONCORDANCE HUBBLE CONSTANT. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/794/2/135
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
