The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The tight-binding bond model
Open accessAbstract
The authors present a tight-binding model of cohesion and interatomic forces which exploits the variational principle of density functional theory. The binding energy of a solid is expressed as a sum of four terms, each of which has a clear physical meaning. The first two terms are the covalent bond and promotion energies, which are found by solving the electronic Hamiltonian to obtain the density matrix. The remaining two terms describe changes in the total electrostatic and exchange-correlation energies on forming the solid from isolated atoms. The variational principle allows these two terms to be expressed as functionals of a superposition of frozen atomic charge densities. The authors show that they may then be approximated by a sum of pair potentials. The importance of self-consistency in tight-binding models is discussed with particular attention to the evaluation of the bulk modulus and certain interatomic force constants by frozen-phonon calculations. It is shown that serious errors may arise in non-self-consistent models due to the violation of charge conservation and the neglect of variations in the potential caused by charge flow. The authors advocate local charge neutrality as the simplest approximation to self-consistency which overcomes these problems. This assumption leads to a remarkably simple expression for the force on an atom due to its neighbours, which is both physically transparent and computationally efficient. These concepts are illustrated for three-dimensional solids by calculations of covalent bond energies in BCC, FCC and HCP transition metals using a canonical d-band model. Model one-dimensional calculations are also presented which illustrate the computation of covalent bond energies and interatomic forces at surfaces and interfaces, and the importance of local charge neutrality in the model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects
Kohn, W., & Sham, L. J. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 · Cited by 64,135
Cited by
Atomic cluster expansion for accurate and transferable interatomic potentials
Drautz, R. (2019) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.014104 · Cited by 959
Tight-binding modelling of materials
Goringe, C. M., Bowler, D. R., & Hernández, E. (1997) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/60/12/001 · Cited by 572
Trends of the surface relaxations, surface energies, and work functions of the 4 d transition metals
Methfessel, M., Hennig, D., & Scheffler, M. (1992) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.46.4816 · Cited by 572
Environment-dependent interatomic potential for bulk silicon
Bazant, M. Z., Kaxiras, E., & Justo, J. F. (1997) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.56.8542 · Cited by 419
New many-body potential for the bond order
Pettifor, D. (1989) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.63.2480 · Cited by 400
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sutton, A. P., Finnis, M. W., Pettifor, D. G., & Ohta, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1988-01-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-66
- ISSN
- 0022-3719 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160684505
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The tight-binding bond model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0022-3719/21/1/007
- The paper
- Sutton, A. P., Finnis, M. W., Pettifor, D. G., & Ohta, Y. (1988). The tight-binding bond model. Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/21/1/007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.