Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 453

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The tight-binding bond model

Open access
Sutton, A P, Finnis, M W, Pettifor, D G, Ohta, Y·1988·Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics

Abstract

The authors present a tight-binding model of cohesion and interatomic forces which exploits the variational principle of density functional theory. The binding energy of a solid is expressed as a sum of four terms, each of which has a clear physical meaning. The first two terms are the covalent bond and promotion energies, which are found by solving the electronic Hamiltonian to obtain the density matrix. The remaining two terms describe changes in the total electrostatic and exchange-correlation energies on forming the solid from isolated atoms. The variational principle allows these two terms to be expressed as functionals of a superposition of frozen atomic charge densities. The authors show that they may then be approximated by a sum of pair potentials. The importance of self-consistency in tight-binding models is discussed with particular attention to the evaluation of the bulk modulus and certain interatomic force constants by frozen-phonon calculations. It is shown that serious errors may arise in non-self-consistent models due to the violation of charge conservation and the neglect of variations in the potential caused by charge flow. The authors advocate local charge neutrality as the simplest approximation to self-consistency which overcomes these problems. This assumption leads to a remarkably simple expression for the force on an atom due to its neighbours, which is both physically transparent and computationally efficient. These concepts are illustrated for three-dimensional solids by calculations of covalent bond energies in BCC, FCC and HCP transition metals using a canonical d-band model. Model one-dimensional calculations are also presented which illustrate the computation of covalent bond energies and interatomic forces at surfaces and interfaces, and the importance of local charge neutrality in the model.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0022-3719/21/1/007

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 453

Metadata

Authors
Sutton, A. P., Finnis, M. W., Pettifor, D. G., & Ohta, Y.
Venue
Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics
Published
1988-01-10
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
35-66
ISSN
0022-3719 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160684505
Cited by
453
References
1
FWCI
13.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The tight-binding bond model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0022-3719/21/1/007
The paper
Sutton, A. P., Finnis, M. W., Pettifor, D. G., & Ohta, Y. (1988). The tight-binding bond model. Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/21/1/007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.