The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Surface modification of polymer surfaces: atmospheric plasma versus vacuum plasma treatments
Open accessAbstract
An atmospheric pressure non-equilibrium plasma (APNEP) has been developed in the UK by EA Technology Ltd and is currently being investigated in collaboration with the University of Surrey. The main focus is the use of atmospheric pressure plasmas to modify the surfaces of commercially important polymers including polyolefins, poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly(methyl methacrylate). These surface modifications include surface cleaning and degreasing, oxidation, reduction, grafting, cross-linking (carbonization), etching and deposition. When trying to achieve targeted surface engineering, it is vital to gain an understanding of the mechanisms that cause these effects, for example, surface functionalization, adhesion promotion or multi-layer deposition. Hence comparisons between vacuum plasma treated surfaces have also been sought with a view to using the extensive vacuum plasma literature to gain further insight. In this paper, we will introduce the APNEP and compare the key characteristics of the plasma with those of traditional vacuum plasma systems before highlighting some of the surface modifications that can be achieved by using atmospheric plasma. Data from the analysis of treated polymers (by spectroscopy, microscopy and surface energy studies) and from direct measurements of the plasma and afterglow will be presented. Finally, our current understanding of the processes involved will be given, particularly those that are important in downstream surface treatments which take place remote from the plasma source.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Polymer surface modification for the attachment of bioactive compounds
Goddard, J. M., & Hotchkiss, J. H. (2007) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.04.002 · Cited by 1,379
Kalia, S., Thakur, K., Celli, A., Kiechel, M. A., & Schauer, C. L. (2013) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2013.04.009 · Cited by 289
Adhesion enhancement of polymer surfaces by atmospheric plasma treatment
Shenton, M. J., Lovell-Hoare, M. C., & Stevens, G. C. (2001) · Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics · doi:10.1088/0022-3727/34/18/307 · Cited by 273
Self-citationBauer, A., Ni, Y., Bauer, S., Paulsen, P., Modic, M., Walsh, J. L., & Smulders, F. J. M. (2017) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.02.003 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Shenton, M. J., & Stevens, G. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2001-09-05
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 2761-2768
- ISSN
- 0022-3727 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6463
- OpenAlex
- W2003266606
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Surface modification of polymer surfaces: atmospheric plasma versus vacuum plasma treatments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0022-3727/34/18/308
- The paper
- Shenton, M. J., & Stevens, G. C. (2001). Surface modification of polymer surfaces: atmospheric plasma versus vacuum plasma treatments. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/34/18/308
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.