The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measurement and interpretation of swarm parameters and their application in plasma modelling
Open accessAbstract
In this review paper, we discuss the current status of the physics of charged particle swarms, mainly electrons, having plasma modelling in mind. The measurements of the swarm coefficients and the availability of the data are briefly discussed. We try to give a summary of the past ten years and cite the main reviews and databases, which store the majority of the earlier work. The need for reinitiating the swarm experiments and where and how those would be useful is pointed out. We also add some guidance on how to find information on ions and fast neutrals. Most space is devoted to interpretation of transport data, analysis of kinetic phenomena, and accuracy of calculation and proper use of transport data in plasma models. We have tried to show which aspects of kinetic theory developed for swarm physics and which segments of data would be important for further improvement of plasma models. Finally, several examples are given where actual models are mostly based on the physics of swarms and those include Townsend discharges, afterglows, breakdown and some atmospheric phenomena. Finally we stress that, while complex, some of the results from the kinetic theory of swarms and the related phenomenology must be used either to test the plasma models or even to bring in new physics or higher accuracy and reliability to the models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing
Lieberman, M. A., & Lichtenberg, A. J. (2005) · doi:10.1002/0471724254 · Cited by 4,748
Hagelaar, G. J. M., & Pitchford, L. C. (2005) · Plasma Sources Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/0963-0252/14/4/011 · Cited by 3,422
Cited by
Plasma–liquid interactions: a review and roadmap
Bruggeman, P. J., Kushner, M. J., Locke, B. R., Gardeniers, J. G. E., Graham, W. G., Graves, D. B., Hofman-Caris, R. C. H. M., Maric, D., Reid, J. P., Ceriani, E., et al. (2016) · Plasma Sources Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/0963-0252/25/5/053002 · Cited by 1,725
Pancheshnyi, S., Biagi, S., Bordage, M. C., Hagelaar, G. J. M., Morgan, W. L., Phelps, A. V., & Pitchford, L. C. (2012) · Chemical Physics · doi:10.1016/j.chemphys.2011.04.020 · Cited by 318
Carbone, E., Graef, W., Hagelaar, G., Boer, D., Hopkins, M. M., Stephens, J. C., Yee, B. T., Pancheshnyi, S., van Dijk, J., & Pitchford, L. (2021) · Atoms · doi:10.3390/atoms9010016 · Cited by 177
Evaluation of angular scattering models for electron-neutral collisions in Monte Carlo simulations
Janssen, J. F. J., Pitchford, L. C., Hagelaar, G. J. M., & van Dijk, J. (2016) · Plasma Sources Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/0963-0252/25/5/055026 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Petrović, Z. L., Dujko, S., Marić, D., Malović, G., Nikitović, Ž., Šašić, O., Jovanović, J., Stojanović, V, & Radmilović-Rađenović, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2009-09-18
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 194002
- ISSN
- 0022-3727 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6463
- OpenAlex
- W1968817349
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement and interpretation of swarm parameters and their application in plasma modelling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0022-3727/42/19/194002
- The paper
- Petrović, Z. L., Dujko, S., Marić, D., Malović, G., Nikitović, Ž., Šašić, O., Jovanović, J., Stojanović, V, & Radmilović-Rađenović, M. (2009). Measurement and interpretation of swarm parameters and their application in plasma modelling. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/42/19/194002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.