The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tokamak disruption alarm based on a neural network model of the high- beta limit
Open accessAbstract
An artificial neural network, combining signals from a large number of plasma diagnostics, was used to estimate the high- beta disruption boundary in the DIII-D tokamak. It is shown that inclusion of many diagnostic measurements results in a much more accurate prediction of the disruption boundary than that provided by the traditional Troyon limit. A trained neural network constitutes a non-linear, non-parametric model of the disruption boundary. Through the analysis of the input-output sensitivities, the relative statistical significance of various diagnostic measurements (plasma parameters) for the determination of the disruption boundary is directly assessed and the number of diagnostics used by the neural network model is reduced to the necessary minimum. The neural network is trained to map the disruption boundary throughout most of the discharge. As a result, it can predict the high- beta disruption boundary on a time-scale of the order of 100 ms (much longer than the precursor growth time), which makes this approach ideally suitable for real time application in a disruption avoidance scheme. Owing to the relative simplicity of the required computations, the neural network is easily implemented in a real time system. A prototype of the neural network disruption alarm was installed within the DIII-D digital plasma control system, and its real time operation, with a typical time resolution of 10 ms, was demonstrated
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Prior work has tried to preemptively detect disruptions for tokamak reactors, using supervised learning methods such as supportvector machines, adaptive fuzzy logic, decision trees, and deep learning [110,413,567,811,846,850] on previous disruption data.”
From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [850]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation
Haykin, S. (1998) · Cited by 30,070
Reconstruction of current profile parameters and plasma shapes in tokamaks
Lao, L. L., John, H. S., Stambaugh, R. D., Kellman, A. G., & Pfeiffer, W. (1985) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/25/11/007 · Cited by 1,794
Neural networks and their applications
Bishop, C. M. (1994) · Review of Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1063/1.1144830 · Cited by 981
Artificial neural systems: foundations, paradigms, applications, and implementations
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-1599 · Cited by 414
Schüller, F. C. (1995) · Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion · doi:10.1088/0741-3335/37/11a/009 · Cited by 263
Locked modes in DIII-D and a method for prevention of the low density mode
Scoville, J. T., Haye, R. J. L., Kellman, A. G., Osborne, T. H., Stambaugh, R. D., Strait, E. J., & Taylor, T. S. (1991) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/31/5/006 · Cited by 168
Stability of high beta tokamak plasmas*
Strait, E. J. (1994) · Physics of Plasmas · doi:10.1063/1.870691 · Cited by 157
Fast non-linear extraction of plasma equilibrium parameters using a neural network mapping
Lister, J. B., & Schnurrenberger, H. (1991) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/31/7/005 · Cited by 87
Feedback stabilization of disruption precursors in a tokamak
Morris, A. W. L., Hender, T. C., Hugill, J., Haynes, P. S., Johnson, P. C., Lloyd, B., Robinson, D. C., Silvester, C., Arshad, S., & Fishpool, G. (1990) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.64.1254 · Cited by 83
Impurity effects on imode stability and transport
Fröjdh, M., Liljeström, M., & Nordman, H. (1992) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/32/3/i06 · Cited by 74
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chapter 3: MHD stability, operational limits and disruptions
Hender, T. C., Wesley, J. C., Bialek, J., Bondeson, A., Boozer, A. H., Buttery, R. J., Garofalo, A. M., Goodman, T., Granetz, R., Gribov, Y., et al. (2007) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/47/6/s03 · Cited by 1,174
Predicting disruptive instabilities in controlled fusion plasmas through deep learning
Kates-Harbeck, J., Svyatkovskiy, A., & Tang, W. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1116-4 · Cited by 367
Tackling climate change with machine learning
Rolnick, D., Donti, P. L., Kaack, L. H., Kochanski, K., Lacoste, A., Sankaran, K., Ross, A. S., Milojevic-Dupont, N., Jaques, N., Waldman-Brown, A., et al. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3485128 · Cited by 336
Chapter 3: MHD stability, operational limits and disruptions
ITER Physics Expert Group on Disrup MHD, & Editors, I. P. B. (1999) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/39/12/303 · Cited by 335
Disruption scenarios, their mitigation and operation window in ITER
正芳, 杉., Shimada, M., Fujieda, H., Gribov, Y., Ioki, K., Kawano, Y., Khayrutdinov, R. R., Lukash, V. E., & Ohmori, J. (2007) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/47/4/012 · Cited by 178
An advanced disruption predictor for JET tested in a simulated real-time environment
Ratta, G. A., Vega, J., Murari, A., Vagliasindi, G., Johnson, M. F., & de Vries, P. C. (2010) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/50/2/025005 · Cited by 128
A real-time machine learning-based disruption predictor in DIII-D
Rea, C., Montes, K., Erickson, K. G., Granetz, R., & Tinguely, R. A. (2019) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ab28bf · Cited by 114
Disruption prediction investigations using Machine Learning tools on DIII-D and Alcator C-Mod
Rea, C., Granetz, R., Montes, K., Tinguely, R. A., Eidietis, N. W., Hanson, J. M., & Sammuli, B. (2018) · Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion · doi:10.1088/1361-6587/aac7fe · Cited by 111
Machine learning for disruption warnings on Alcator C-Mod, DIII-D, and EAST
Montes, K., Rea, C., Granetz, R., Tinguely, R. A., Eidietis, N. W., Meneghini, O., Chen, D., Shen, B., Xiao, B., Erickson, K. G., et al. (2019) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ab1df4 · Cited by 105
Chapter 8: Plasma operation and control
ITER Physics Expert Group on Disrup MHD, ITER Physics Expert Group on Energe Drive, ITER Physics Expert Group on Diagnostics, & Editors, I. P. B. (1999) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/39/12/308 · Cited by 100
Disruption forecasting at JET using neural networks
Cannas, B., Fanni, A., Marongiu, E., & Sonato, P. (2004) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/44/1/008 · Cited by 98
Kaptanoglu, A. A., Morgan, K., Hansen, C. J., & Brunton, S. L. (2021) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.104.015206 · Cited by 98
A cross-tokamak neural network disruption predictor for the JET and ASDEX Upgrade tokamaks
Windsor, C. G., Pautasso, G., Tichmann, C., Buttery, R. J., Hender, T. C., Contributors, J. E., & Team, T. A. U. (2005) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/45/5/004 · Cited by 91
On-line prediction and mitigation of disruptions in ASDEX Upgrade
Pautasso, G., Tichmann, C., Egorov, S. M., Zehetbauer, T., Gruber, O., Maraschek, M., Mast, K. F., Mertens, V., Perchermeier, I., Raupp, G., et al. (2002) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/42/1/314 · Cited by 91
An adaptive real-time disruption predictor for ASDEX Upgrade
Cannas, B., Fanni, A., Pautasso, G., Sias, G., & Sonato, P. (2010) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/50/7/075004 · Cited by 83
A prediction tool for real-time application in the disruption protection system at JET
Cannas, B., Fanni, A., Sonato, P., Zedda, M. K., & contributors, J.-E. (2007) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/47/11/018 · Cited by 83
Real-time capable first principle based modelling of tokamak turbulent transport
Citrin, J., Breton, S., Felici, F., Imbeaux, F., Aniel, T., Artaud, J. F., Baiocchi, B., Bourdelle, C., Camenen, Y., & Garcia, J. (2015) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/55/9/092001 · Cited by 78
Neural-net disruption predictor in JT-60U
Yoshino, R. (2003) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/43/12/021 · Cited by 76
Stevens, R. L., USDOE, Taylor, V., Nichols, J., Maccabe, A. B. ‘., Yelick, K., & Brown, D. (2020) · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · doi:10.2172/1604756 · Cited by 90
Piccione, A., Berkery, J. W., Sabbagh, S. A., & Andreopoulos, Y. (2020) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ab7597 · Cited by 73
Prototype of an adaptive disruption predictor for JET based on fuzzy logic and regression trees
Murari, A., Vagliasindi, G., Arena, P., Fortuna, L., Barana, O., & Johnson, M. (2008) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/48/3/035010 · Cited by 72
Hybrid deep-learning architecture for general disruption prediction across multiple tokamaks
Zhu, J., Rea, C., Montes, K., Granetz, R., Sweeney, R., & Tinguely, R. A. (2020) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/1741-4326/abc664 · Cited by 70
Machine learning control for disruption and tearing mode avoidance
Fu, Y., Eldon, D., Erickson, K. G., Kleijwegt, K., Lupin-Jimenez, L. C., Boyer, M. D., Eidietis, N. W., Barbour, N., Izacard, O., & Kolemen, E. (2020) · Physics of Plasmas · doi:10.1063/1.5125581 · Cited by 68
Exploratory Machine Learning Studies for Disruption Prediction Using Large Databases on DIII-D
Rea, C., & Granetz, R. (2018) · Fusion Science & Technology · doi:10.1080/15361055.2017.1407206 · Cited by 67
Hybrid neural network for density limit disruption prediction and avoidance on J-TEXT tokamak
Zheng, W., Hu, F. R., Zhang, M., Chen, Z., Zhao, X., Wang, X., Shi, P., Zhang, X. L., Zhang, X. Q., Zhou, Y., et al. (2018) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/1741-4326/aaad17 · Cited by 62
Disruption prediction on EAST tokamak using a deep learning algorithm
Guo, B., Chen, D., Shen, B., Rea, C., Granetz, R., Zeng, L., Hu, W., Qian, J. P., Sun, Y., & Xiao, B. (2021) · Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion · doi:10.1088/1361-6587/ac228b · Cited by 59
Sweeney, R., Choi, W., Haye, R. J. L., Mao, S., Olofsson, E., & Volpe, F. A. (2016) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/57/1/016019 · Cited by 58
Emerging applications in tokamak plasma control
Walker, M. L., Humphreys, D. A., Mazon, D., Moreau, D., Okabayashi, M., Osborne, T. H., & Schuster, E. (2006) · IEEE Control Systems · doi:10.1109/mcs.2006.1615272 · Cited by 55
Disruption prediction using a full convolutional neural network on EAST
Guo, B., Shen, B., Chen, D., Rea, C., Granetz, R., Huang, Y., Zeng, L., Zhang, H., Qian, J. P., Sun, Y., et al. (2020) · Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion · doi:10.1088/1361-6587/abcbab · Cited by 50
Advancing Fusion with Machine Learning Research Needs Workshop Report
Humphreys, D., Kupresanin, A., Boyer, M. D., Canik, J., Chang, C. S., Cyr, E. C., Granetz, R., Hittinger, J., Kolemen, E., Lawrence, E., et al. (2020) · Journal of Fusion Energy · doi:10.1007/s10894-020-00258-1 · Cited by 47
Neural-net predictor for beta limit disruptions in JT-60U
Yoshino, R. (2005) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/45/11/003 · Cited by 49
Mitigation of disruptions by fast helium gas puffs
Finken, K. H., Mank, G., Krämer-Flecken, A., & Jaspers, R. (2001) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/41/11/315 · Cited by 48
Detection of disruptions in the high-βspherical torus NSTX
Gerhardt, S. P., Darrow, D., Bell, R. E., LeBlanc, B. P., Menard, J. E., Mueller, D., Roquemore, A. L., Sabbagh, S. A., & Yuh, H. Y. (2013) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/53/6/063021 · Cited by 44
Unbiased and non-supervised learning methods for disruption prediction at JET
Murari, A., Vega, J., Ratta, G. A., Vagliasindi, G., Johnson, M. F., & Hong, S. (2009) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/49/5/055028 · Cited by 43
Prediction of disruptions on ASDEX Upgrade using discriminant analysis
Zhang, Y., Pautasso, G., Kardaun, O., Tardini, G., Zhang, X. D., & the ASDEX Upgrade Team (2011) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/51/6/063039 · Cited by 42
Murari, A., Rossi, R., Peluso, E., Lungaroni, M., Gaudio, P. D., Gelfusa, M., Ratta, G. A., Vega, J., JET, & ASDEX (2020) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ab77a6 · Cited by 42
Forecasting disruptions in the ADITYA tokamak using neural networks
Sengupta, A., & Ranjan, P. (2000) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/40/12/304 · Cited by 42
Forecast of TEXT plasma disruptions using soft X rays as input signal in a neural network
Vannucci, A., Oliveira, K. A., & Tajima, T. (1999) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/39/2/308 · Cited by 40
Adaptive learning for disruption prediction in non-stationary conditions
Murari, A., Lungaroni, M., Gelfusa, M., Peluso, E., Vega, J., & Contributors, J. (2019) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ab1ecc · Cited by 36
Disruption predictor based on neural network and anomaly detection on J-TEXT
Zheng, W., Wu, Q., Zhang, M., Chen, Z., Shang, Y., Fan, J., Pan, Y., & J-TEXT Team (2020) · Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion · doi:10.1088/1361-6587/ab6b02 · Cited by 36
An application of survival analysis to disruption prediction via Random Forests
Tinguely, R. A., Montes, K., Rea, C., Sweeney, R., & Granetz, R. (2019) · Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion · doi:10.1088/1361-6587/ab32fc · Cited by 34
Data-driven profile prediction for DIII-D
Abbate, J., Conlin, R., & Kolemen, E. (2021) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/1741-4326/abe08d · Cited by 34
Automatic disruption classification in JET with the ITER-like wall
Cannas, B., de Vries, P. C., Fanni, A., Murari, A., Pau, A., Sias, G., & Contributors, J. (2015) · Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion · doi:10.1088/0741-3335/57/12/125003 · Cited by 34
Zhu, J., Rea, C., Granetz, R., Marmar, E., Sweeney, R., Montes, K., & Tinguely, R. A. (2023) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/1741-4326/acb803 · Cited by 33
Lister, J. B., Portone, A., & Gribov, Y. (2006) · IEEE Control Systems · doi:10.1109/mcs.2006.1615274 · Cited by 32
Prediction of density limit disruptions on the J-TEXT tokamak
Wang, S. Y., Chen, Z. Y., Huang, D., Tong, R., Yan, W., Wei, Y. N., K, T., Zhang, M., & Zhuang, G. (2016) · Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion · doi:10.1088/0741-3335/58/5/055014 · Cited by 31
Prediction of density limit disruption boundaries from diagnostic signals using neural networks
Sengupta, A., & Ranjan, P. (2001) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/41/5/302 · Cited by 29
Machine learning and serving of discrete field theories
Qin, H. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-76301-0 · Cited by 30
A new disruption mitigation valve (DMV) and gas flow in guiding tubes of different diameter
Finken, K. H., Lehnen, M., & Bozhenkov, S. (2011) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/51/3/033007 · Cited by 28
Experiment data-driven modeling of tokamak discharge in EAST
Wan, C., Yu, Z., Wang, F., Liu, X., & Li, J. (2021) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/1741-4326/abf419 · Cited by 31
Machine learning of turbulent transport in fusion plasmas with neural network
Li, H., Fu, Y., Li, J., & Wang, Z. (2021) · Plasma Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-6272/ac15ec · Cited by 30
Scenario adaptive disruption prediction study for next generation burning-plasma tokamaks
Zhu, J., Rea, C., Granetz, R., Marmar, E., Montes, K., Sweeney, R., Tinguely, R. A., Chen, D., Shen, B., Xiao, B., et al. (2021) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ac28ae · Cited by 28
Fuzzy-neural approaches to the prediction of disruptions in ASDEX Upgrade
Morabito, F. C., Versaci, M., Pautasso, G., Tichmann, C., & ASDEX Upgrade Team (2001) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/41/11/321 · Cited by 28
Neural networks for real time determination of radiated power in JET
Barana, O., Murari, A., Franz, P., Ingesson, L. C., & Manduchi, G. (2002) · Review of Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1063/1.1463714 · Cited by 27
Disruption prediction and model analysis using LightGBM on J-TEXT and HL-2A
Zhong, Y., Zheng, W., Chen, Z., Xia, F., Yu, L., Wu, Q., Ai, X. K., Shen, C., Yang, Z. Y., Yan, W., et al. (2021) · Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion · doi:10.1088/1361-6587/abfa74 · Cited by 27
Neural network based prediction of no-wall β N limits due to ideal external kink instabilities
Liu, Y., Lao, L. L., Li, L., & Turnbull, A. D. (2020) · Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion · doi:10.1088/1361-6587/ab6f56 · Cited by 26
Neural network representability of fully ionized plasma fluid model closures
Maulik, R., Garland, N., Burby, J. W., Tang, X.-Z., & Balaprakash, P. (2020) · Physics of Plasmas · doi:10.1063/5.0006457 · Cited by 26
Real-Time and Adaptive Reservoir Computing With Application to Profile Prediction in Fusion Plasma
Jalalvand, A., Abbate, J., Conlin, R., Verdoolaege, G., & Kolemen, E. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2021.3085504 · Cited by 26
Prediction and mitigation of disruptions in ASDEX Upgrade
Pautasso, G., Egorov, S. M., Tichmann, C., Fuchs, C., Herrmann, A., Maraschek, M., Mast, F., Mertens, V., Perchermeier, I., Windsor, C. G., et al. (2001) · Journal of Nuclear Materials · doi:10.1016/s0022-3115(00)00546-8 · Cited by 26
Murari, A., Rossi, R., Lungaroni, M., Baruzzo, M., & Gelfusa, M. (2020) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/1741-4326/abc9f3 · Cited by 25
HL-2A tokamak disruption forecasting based on an artificial neural network
Wang, H., Wang, A., Qing-Wei, Y., Xuan-Tong, D., Jia-Qi, D., Sanuki, H., & Itoh, H. (2007) · Chinese Physics · doi:10.1088/1009-1963/16/12/030 · Cited by 25
Automatic disruption classification at JET: comparison of different pattern recognition techniques
Cannas, B., Cau, F., Fanni, A., Sonato, P., Zedda, M. K., & Contributors, J.-E. (2006) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/46/7/002 · Cited by 24
Gas flow analysis of a disruption mitigation valve (DMV)
Finken, K. H., Lehnen, M., & Bozhenkov, S. (2008) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/48/11/115001 · Cited by 21
Wallace, G. M., Bai, Z., Sadre, R., Perciano, T., Bertelli, N., Shiraiwa, S., Bethel, E. W., & Wright, J. C. (2022) · Journal of Plasma Physics · doi:10.1017/s0022377822000708 · Cited by 20
Deep sequence to sequence learning-based prediction of major disruptions in ADITYA tokamak
Agarwal, A., Mishra, A., Sharma, P., Jain, S., Daniel, R., Ranjan, S., Manchanda, R., Ghosh, J., Tanna, R. L., & ADITYA Team (2021) · Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion · doi:10.1088/1361-6587/ac234c · Cited by 20
Heterodyne ECE diagnostic in the mode detection and disruption avoidance at TEXTOR
Krämer-Flecken, A., Finken, K. H., Udintsev, V. S., Larue, H., & Textor Team (2003) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/0029-5515/43/11/016 · Cited by 19
Ratta, G. A., Vega, J., & Murari, A. (2014) · Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion · doi:10.1088/0741-3335/56/11/114004 · Cited by 16
Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Stack Design Optimization Using an Improved Jaya Algorithm
Chakraborty, U. K. (2019) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en12163176 · Cited by 17
Buceti, G., Fortuna, L., Rizzo, A., & Xibilia, M. G. (2002) · Fusion Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/s0920-3796(02)00036-4 · Cited by 17
Event hazard function learning and survival analysis for tearing mode onset characterization
Olofsson, E., Humphreys, D. A., & Haye, R. J. L. (2018) · Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion · doi:10.1088/1361-6587/aac662 · Cited by 16
Wei, Y., Levesque, J. P., Hansen, C. J., Mauel, M. E., & Navratil, G. A. (2021) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ac3296 · Cited by 17
Overview of machine learning applications in fusion plasma experiments on J-TEXT tokamak
Zheng, W., Xue, F., Shen, C., Zhong, Y., Ai, X., Zhongyong, C. H. E. N., Ding, Y., Zhang, M., Yang, Z., Wang, N., et al. (2022) · Plasma Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-6272/ac9e46 · Cited by 14
Role and Requirements for Plasma Measurements on ITER
ITER Joint Central Team and Home Teams, Mukhovatov, V. S., Bartiromo, R., Boucher, D., Costley, A. E., de Kock, L., Ebisawa, K., Edmonds, P. H., Gribov, Y., Janeschitz, G., et al. (1998) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5353-3_2 · Cited by 14
Comparison of Advanced Machine Learning Tools for Disruption Prediction and Disruption Studies
Odstrčil, M., Murari, A., & Mlynar, J. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science · doi:10.1109/tps.2013.2264880 · Cited by 13
Temperature Model Identification of FTU Liquid Lithium Limiter
Apicella, M. L., Buscarino, A., Corradino, C., Fortuna, L., Mazzitelli, G., & Xibilia, M. G. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology · doi:10.1109/tcst.2017.2695170 · Cited by 13
Optical plasma boundary detection and its reconstruction on EAST tokamak
Yan, H., Han, X., Yang, J., Yan, R., Sun, P. J., Hu, J., Wang, J., Ding, R., Ren, H., Xiao, S., et al. (2023) · Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion · doi:10.1088/1361-6587/acc689 · Cited by 12
A Disruption Predictor Based on Fuzzy Logic Applied to JET Database
Vagliasindi, G., Murari, A., Arena, P., Fortuna, L., Johnson, M. F., & Howell, D. F. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science · doi:10.1109/tps.2007.914067 · Cited by 12
Tokamak plasma disruption precursor onset time study based on semi-supervised anomaly detection
Ai, X., Zheng, W., Zhang, M., Chen, D., Shen, C., Guo, B., Xiao, B., Zhong, Y., Wang, N., Yang, Z., et al. (2023) · Nuclear Engineering and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.net.2023.12.004 · Cited by 11
Boyer, M. D., Rea, C., & Clement, M. (2021) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ac359e · Cited by 11
Neural Network Prediction of Disruptions Caused by Locked Modes on J-TEXT Tokamak
Ding, Y., Jin, X., Chen, Z., & Zhuang, G. (2013) · Plasma Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/1009-0630/15/11/14 · Cited by 11
Sengupta, A., & Ranjan, P. (2001) · Fusion Technology · doi:10.13182/fst01-a146 · Cited by 11
Development of a neural network technique for KSTAR Thomson scattering diagnostics
Lee, S. H., Lee, J., Yamada, I., & Park, J.-S. (2016) · Review of Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1063/1.4961079 · Cited by 10
Keith, Z., Nagpal, C., Rea, C., & Tinguely, R. A. (2024) · Journal of Fusion Energy · doi:10.1007/s10894-024-00413-y · Cited by 9
Implementation of AI/DEEP learning disruption predictor into a plasma control system
Tang, W. M., Dong, G., Barr, J. L., Erickson, K. G., Conlin, R., Boyer, D., Kates‐Harbeck, J., Felker, K. G., Rea, C., Logan, N. C., et al. (2023) · Contributions to Plasma Physics · doi:10.1002/ctpp.202200095 · Cited by 9
Disruption Physics and Mitigation on DIII-D
Whyte, D. G., Humphreys, D. A., & Kellman, A. G. (2005) · Fusion Science & Technology · doi:10.13182/fst05-a1051 · Cited by 8
Open and emerging control problems in tokamak plasma control
Walker, M. L., Schuster, E., Mazon, D., & Moreau, D. (2008) · IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) · doi:10.1109/cdc.2008.4739156 · Cited by 8
Magnetic-Confinement Fusion—Plasma Theory: Tokamak Magnetohydrodynamic Equilibrium and Stability
Lao, L. L., Liu, Y., & Turnbull, A. D. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819725-7.00230-0 · Cited by 8
Übeylï, M., & Übeylı, E. D. (2009) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.08.005 · Cited by 7
Cross-tokamak deployment study of plasma disruption predictors based on convolutional autoencoder
Ai, X. K., Zheng, W., Zhang, M., Ding, Y., Chen, D., Chen, Z., Shen, C., Guo, B., Wang, N., Yang, Z., et al. (2024) · Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion · doi:10.1088/1361-6587/ad5934 · Cited by 6
Vitela, J. E. (2007) · Fusion Science & Technology · doi:10.13182/fst07-a1484 · Cited by 5
A neural network approach for the detection of the locking position in RFX
Barana, O., Manduchi, G., Serri, A., & Sonato, P. (2001) · Fusion Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/s0920-3796(00)00551-2 · Cited by 5
A fuzzy neural approach to plasma disruption prediction in tokamak reactors
Morabito, F. C., & Versaci, M. (2003) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.1999.836222 · Cited by 5
High-beta disruption prediction study on HL-2A with instance-based transfer learning
Zhong, Y., Zheng, W., Chen, Z., Yan, W., Xia, F., Yu, L., Xue, F. M., Shen, C., Ai, X., Yang, Z., et al. (2024) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ad59b5 · Cited by 4
A Machine Learning Predictor for Vertical Displacement Events on EAST
Wang, H., Hu, W., Wang, Y., Jia, Y., Huang, Y., Luo, Z., Su, C., Zhang, R., Yuan, Q., & Xiao, B. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science · doi:10.1109/tps.2025.3528970 · Cited by 4
Perspectives on the FESAC transformative enabling capabilities: Priorities, plans, and Status
Lumsdaine, A., Maingi, R., Field, K. G., Gourlay, S. A., Humphreys, D. A., Katoh, Y., Kessel, C., & Wang, X. (2020) · Fusion Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.111529 · Cited by 4
Data-driven disruption prediction in GOLEM Tokamak using ensemble classifiers
Chandrasekaran, J., Madhawa, S., & Sangeetha, J. (2020) · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.3233/jifs-189155 · Cited by 4
蔡, J. 剑. C., 梁, Y. 云. L., Knieps, A., 齐, D. 东. Q., Wang, E., 向, H. 皓. X., 廖, L. 亮. L., 黄, J. 杰. H., 阳, J. 杰. Y., 黄, J. 佳. H., et al. (2023) · Plasma Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-6272/ad1571 · Cited by 4
Barana, O., & Manduchi, G. (2002) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s005210200007 · Cited by 4
Design and development of an off-normal warning system for SPARC
Saperstein, A., Rea, C., Sweeney, R., Boyer, M. D., Trevisan, G. L., Wei, Y., & the MIT PSFC Disruptions Team (2025) · Nuclear Fusion · doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ae074e · Cited by 3
Joshi, R., Ghosh, J., Kalani, N. B., Tanna, R. L., & Teams, A. A.-U. (2023) · Soft Computing Research Society eBooks · doi:10.52458/978-81-955020-5-9-69 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Wroblewski, D., Jahns, G. L., & Leuer, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Lockheed Martin Orincon (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Leuer, J.A
- Venue
- Nuclear Fusion
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 725-741
- ISSN
- 0029-5515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2014096208
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 2.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nuclear Fusion (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Small Business Innovation Research
- Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Magnetic confinement fusion research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Fusion and Plasma Physics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Fusion materials and technologies
- Keywords
- tokamak disruptions, artificial neural networks, DIII-D tokamak, plasma diagnostics, disruption avoidance, plasma control system
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
