Cited by 323Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses

Use of the water absorption spectrum to quantify tissue chromophore concentration changes in near-infrared spectroscopy

Matcher, S J, Cope, M, Delpy, D T·1994·Physics in Medicine and Biology

Abstract

We describe a simple method for measuring the 'differential pathlength' of photons in a scattering medium utilizing the spectral absorption features of water. Determination of this differential pathlength is a prerequisite for quantifying chromophore concentration changes measured by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), and the method proposed here achieves this without the need for time- or frequency-resolved measurements. The quantification of tissue chromophore concentration measurements is a major goal in NIRS research, allowing, for example, the non-invasive measurement of blood flow and volume in the brain and other organs. We present the results of validation experiments performed on tissue phantoms comparing the differential path estimates yielded by water absorption and time-resolved measurements, finding that the weak water absorption feature at 820 nm can yield a differential path estimate in addition to the main feature at 975 nm. We also present results from in vivo studies in which we find that whilst the 820 nm feature is measured with lower accuracy for a given light flux than the 975 nm feature, it is intrinsically a more accurate differential path estimator. Studies on the adult forearm showing differences between time-resolved and water absorption differential path estimates suggest that the measurement of both could aid in quantifying NIRS signals in heterogeneous tissues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0031-9155/39/1/011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With scattering present, it is accepted that beyond the mean free path a form of the Beer Lambert law can be written with the attenuation written as e−μs′l, where depth is l and the reduced scattering coefficient is μs′.

    “With scattering present it is accepted that beyond the mean free path a form of the Beer Lambert law can be written with the attenuation written as e−μs′l, where depth is l and the reduced scattering coefficient is μs′.52,53”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 323

Authors
Matcher, S. J., Cope, M., & Delpy, D. T.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Venue
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
1994-01-01
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
177-196
ISSN
  • 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6560
OpenAlex
W2003987283
Cited by
323
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 16
FWCI
7.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physics in Medicine and Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Keywords
near-infrared spectroscopy, tissue scattering, tissue phantoms, time-resolved spectroscopy, heterogeneous tissue
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Body Water, Bone and Bones, Brain, Brain Chemistry, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Head, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Mathematics, Models, Structural, Regional Blood Flow, Spectrophotometry, Infrared, Water, Reproducibility of Results, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review