Use of the water absorption spectrum to quantify tissue chromophore concentration changes in near-infrared spectroscopy
Abstract
We describe a simple method for measuring the 'differential pathlength' of photons in a scattering medium utilizing the spectral absorption features of water. Determination of this differential pathlength is a prerequisite for quantifying chromophore concentration changes measured by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), and the method proposed here achieves this without the need for time- or frequency-resolved measurements. The quantification of tissue chromophore concentration measurements is a major goal in NIRS research, allowing, for example, the non-invasive measurement of blood flow and volume in the brain and other organs. We present the results of validation experiments performed on tissue phantoms comparing the differential path estimates yielded by water absorption and time-resolved measurements, finding that the weak water absorption feature at 820 nm can yield a differential path estimate in addition to the main feature at 975 nm. We also present results from in vivo studies in which we find that whilst the 820 nm feature is measured with lower accuracy for a given light flux than the 975 nm feature, it is intrinsically a more accurate differential path estimator. Studies on the adult forearm showing differences between time-resolved and water absorption differential path estimates suggest that the measurement of both could aid in quantifying NIRS signals in heterogeneous tissues.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
With scattering present, it is accepted that beyond the mean free path a form of the Beer Lambert law can be written with the attenuation written as e−μs′l, where depth is l and the reduced scattering coefficient is μs′.
“With scattering present it is accepted that beyond the mean free path a form of the Beer Lambert law can be written with the attenuation written as e−μs′l, where depth is l and the reduced scattering coefficient is μs′.52,53”
From Effect of skin color on optical properties and the implications for medical optical technologies: a review (2024) · cites this paper as [52]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 323
- Authors
- Matcher, S. J., Cope, M., & Delpy, D. T.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1994-01-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 177-196
- ISSN
- 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6560
- OpenAlex
- W2003987283
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 7.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physics in Medicine and Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
- Keywords
- near-infrared spectroscopy, tissue scattering, tissue phantoms, time-resolved spectroscopy, heterogeneous tissue
- MeSH terms
- Adipose Tissue, Body Water, Bone and Bones, Brain, Brain Chemistry, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Head, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Mathematics, Models, Structural, Regional Blood Flow, Spectrophotometry, Infrared, Water, Reproducibility of Results, Muscle, Skeletal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review