The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses and normal tissue: linear discriminant analysis in texture feature space
Open accessAbstract
We studied the effectiveness of using texture features derived from spatial grey level dependence (SGLD) matrices for classification of masses and normal breast tissue on mammograms. One hundred and sixty-eight regions of interest (ROIS) containing biopsy-proven masses and 504 ROIS containing normal breast tissue were extracted from digitized mammograms for this study. Eight features were calculated for each ROI. The importance of each feature in distinguishing masses from normal tissue was determined by stepwise linear discriminant analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology was used to evaluate the classification accuracy. We investigated the dependence of classification accuracy on the input features, and on the pixel distance and bit depth in the construction of the SGLD matrices. It was found that five of the texture features were important for the classification. The dependence of classification accuracy on distance and bit depth was weak for distances greater than 12 pixels and bit depths greater than seven bits. By randomly and equally dividing the data set into two groups, the classifier was trained and tested on independent data sets. The classifier achieved an average area under the ROC curve, Az, of 0.84 during training and 0.82 during testing. The results demonstrate the feasibility of using linear discriminant analysis in the texture feature space for classification of true and false detections of masses on mammograms in a computer-aided diagnosis scheme.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms
Cheng, H. D., Shi, X. J., Min, R., Hu, L. M., Cai, X. P., & Du, H. N. (2006) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2005.07.006 · Cited by 538
Gurcan, M. N., Sahiner, B., Petrick, N., Chan, H., Kazerooni, E. A., Cascade, P. N., & Hadjiiski, L. (2002) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.1515762 · Cited by 309
Self-citationBreast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Using Mammographic Data: Systematic Review
Gardezi, S. J. S., Elazab, A., Lei, B., & Wang, T. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/14464 · Cited by 268
Vignati, A., Mazzetti, S., Giannini, V, Russo, F., Bollito, E., Porpiglia, F., Stasi, M., & Regge, D. (2015) · Physics in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/60/7/2685 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Chan, H.-P., Wei, D., Helvie, M. A., Sahiner, B., Adler, D. D., Goodsitt, M. M., & Petrick, N.
- Venue
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1995-05-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 857-876
- ISSN
- 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6560
- OpenAlex
- W2038037430
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses and normal tissue: linear discriminant analysis in texture feature space. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0031-9155/40/5/010
- The paper
- Chan, H.-P., Wei, D., Helvie, M. A., Sahiner, B., Adler, D. D., Goodsitt, M. M., & Petrick, N. (1995). Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses and normal tissue: linear discriminant analysis in texture feature space. Physics in Medicine and Biology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/40/5/010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.