The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The magnetic lead field theorem in the quasi-static approximation and its use for magnetoencephalography forward calculation in realistic volume conductors
Open accessAbstract
The equation for the magnetic lead field for a given magnetoencephalography (MEG) channel is well known for arbitrary frequencies omega but is not directly applicable to MEG in the quasi-static approximation. In this paper we derive an equation for omega = 0 starting from the very definition of the lead field instead of using Helmholtz's reciprocity theorems. The results are (a) the transpose of the conductivity times the lead field is divergence-free, and (b) the lead field differs from the one in any other volume conductor by a gradient of a scalar function. Consequently, for a piecewise homogeneous and isotropic volume conductor, the lead field is always tangential at the outermost surface. Based on this theoretical result, we formulated a simple and fast method for the MEG forward calculation for one shell of arbitrary shape: we correct the corresponding lead field for a spherical volume conductor by a superposition of basis functions, gradients of harmonic functions constructed here from spherical harmonics, with coefficients fitted to the boundary conditions. The algorithm was tested for a prolate spheroid of realistic shape for which the analytical solution is known. For high order in the expansion, we found the solutions to be essentially exact and for reasonable accuracies much fewer multiplications are needed than in typical implementations of the boundary element methods. The generalization to more shells is straightforward.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BioelectromagnetismPrinciples and Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields
Malmivuo, J., & Plonsey, R. (1995) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195058239.001.0001 · Cited by 1,834
Cited by
Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., & Schoffelen, J.-M. (2011) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2011/156869 · Cited by 10,323
Large-scale cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity
Hipp, J. F., Hawellek, D. J., Corbetta, M., Siegel, M., & Engel, A. K. (2012) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3101 · Cited by 1,113
Michalareas, G., Vezoli, J., van Pelt, S., Schoffelen, J.-M., Kennedy, H., & Fries, P. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.12.018 · Cited by 696
Speech rhythms and multiplexed oscillatory sensory coding in the human brain
Gross, J., Hoogenboom, N., Thut, G., Schyns, P., Panzeri, S., Belin, P., & Garrod, S. (2013) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001752 · Cited by 643
Prior expectation mediates neural adaptation to repeated sounds in the auditory cortex: an MEG study
Todorovic, A., van Ede, F., Maris, E., & de Lange, F. P. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1425-11.2011 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Nolte, G.
- Venue
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2003-10-24
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 3637-3652
- ISSN
- 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6560
- OpenAlex
- W1974165416
- Cited by
- 1,022
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The magnetic lead field theorem in the quasi-static approximation and its use for magnetoencephalography forward calculation in realistic volume conductors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0031-9155/48/22/002
- The paper
- Nolte, G. (2003). The magnetic lead field theorem in the quasi-static approximation and its use for magnetoencephalography forward calculation in realistic volume conductors. Physics in Medicine and Biology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/48/22/002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.