The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mixed-norm estimates for the M/EEG inverse problem using accelerated gradient methods
Open accessAbstract
Magneto- and electroencephalography (M/EEG) measure the electromagnetic fields produced by the neural electrical currents. Given a conductor model for the head, and the distribution of source currents in the brain, Maxwell's equations allow one to compute the ensuing M/EEG signals. Given the actual M/EEG measurements and the solution of this forward problem, one can localize, in space and in time, the brain regions that have produced the recorded data. However, due to the physics of the problem, the limited number of sensors compared to the number of possible source locations, and measurement noise, this inverse problem is ill-posed. Consequently, additional constraints are needed. Classical inverse solvers, often called minimum norm estimates (MNE), promote source estimates with a small ℓ₂ norm. Here, we consider a more general class of priors based on mixed norms. Such norms have the ability to structure the prior in order to incorporate some additional assumptions about the sources. We refer to such solvers as mixed-norm estimates (MxNE). In the context of M/EEG, MxNE can promote spatially focal sources with smooth temporal estimates with a two-level ℓ₁/ℓ₂ mixed-norm, while a three-level mixed-norm can be used to promote spatially non-overlapping sources between different experimental conditions. In order to efficiently solve the optimization problems of MxNE, we introduce fast first-order iterative schemes that for the ℓ₁/ℓ₂ norm give solutions in a few seconds making such a prior as convenient as the simple MNE. Furthermore, thanks to the convexity of the optimization problem, we can provide optimality conditions that guarantee global convergence. The utility of the methods is demonstrated both with simulations and experimental MEG data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems
Beck, A., & Teboulle, M. (2009) · SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences · doi:10.1137/080716542 · Cited by 11,952
Visual field maps in human cortex.
Wandell, B. A., Dumoulin, S. O., & Brewer, A. A. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.012 · Cited by 1,231 · cited 2×
“The different body parts are mapped to locations at S1 and a location in the visual field maps to an area at V1 This later is known as the retinotopic organization of V1 (Wandell et al. 2007).”
Multiple sparse priors for the M/EEG inverse problem.
Friston, K., Harrison, L., Daunizeau, J., Kiebel, S., Phillips, C., Trujillo-Barreto, N., Henson, R., Flandin, G., & Mattout, J. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.048 · Cited by 589
MAPS IN THE BRAIN: What Can We Learn from Them?
Chklovskii, D. B., & Koulakov, A. A. (2004) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144226 · Cited by 366
Wang, J.-Z., Williamson, S. J., & Kaufman, L. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.142641 · Cited by 299
Combining sparsity and rotational invariance in EEG/MEG source reconstruction
Haufe, S., Nikulin, V. V., Ziehe, A., Müller, K.-R., & Nolte, G. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.246 · Cited by 130
Cited by
Time-frequency mixed-norm estimates: Sparse M/EEG imaging with non-stationary source activations
Gramfort, A., Strohmeier, D., Haueisen, J., Hämäläinen, M. S., & Kowalski, M. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.051 · Cited by 234
Self-citationSohrabpour, A., Lu, Y., Worrell, G., & He, B. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.064 · Cited by 89
“AC C EP TE D M AN U SC R IP T Mixed norm methods have also proven to be effective in analyzing spatio-temporal activity of underlying brain sources (Gramfort et al., 2012; Gramfort et al., 2013a).”
BackgroundInfluentialDoes the mismatch negativity operate on a consciously accessible memory trace?
Dykstra, A. R., & Gutschalk, A. (2015) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500677 · Cited by 42
“Source analysis Weused a combination of anatomically constrained, noise-normalized, minimum-norm estimates (73, 74) known as dynamic statistical parametric mapping (dSPM) (75) and sparse inverse estimates based on an L1/L2mixednorm (MxNE) (76).”
MethodLaminar specificity of the auditory perceptual awareness negativity: a biophysical modeling study
Fernandez Pujol, C., Blundon, E. G., & Dykstra, A. R. (2023) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011003 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Gramfort, A., Kowalski, M., & Hämäläinen, M.
- Venue
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2012-03-16
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1937-1961
- ISSN
- 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6560
- OpenAlex
- W2155136387
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 18.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mixed-norm estimates for the M/EEG inverse problem using accelerated gradient methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0031-9155/57/7/1937
- The paper
- Gramfort, A., Kowalski, M., & Hämäläinen, M. (2012). Mixed-norm estimates for the M/EEG inverse problem using accelerated gradient methods. Physics in Medicine and Biology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/57/7/1937
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.