An introduction to the theory of diffusive shock acceleration of energetic particles in tenuous plasmas
Open accessAbstract
The central idea of diffusive shock acceleration is presented from microscopic and macroscopic viewpoints; applied to reactionless test particles in a steady plane shock the mechanism is shown to produce a power law spectrum in momentum with a slope which, to lowest order in the ratio of plasma to particle speed, depends only on the compression in the shock. The associated time scale is found (also by a macroscopic and a microscopic method) and the problems of spherical shocks, as exemplified by a point explosion and a stellar-wind terminator, are treated by singular perturbation theory. The effect of including the particle reaction is then studied. It is shown that if the scattering is due to resonant waves these can rapidly grow with unknown consequences. The possible steady modified shock structures are classified and generalised Rankine-Hugoniot conditions found. Modifications of the spectrum are discussed on the basis of an exact, if rather artificial, solution, a high-energy asymptotic expansion and a perturbation expansion due to Blandford. It is pointed out that no steady solution can exist for very strong shocks; the possible time dependence is briefly discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A strong shock with Mach ≳5 is required to produce cosmic rays with a spectral index of p≈2.1 following diffusive shock acceleration.
“One, however, requires a strong shock with Mach, M ≳ 5 to produce CR with a spectral index of p ≈ 2 . 1, following a diffusive shock acceleration mechanism where ( p ≈ ( χ + 2) / ( χ -1), with χ as the density compression ratio; Bell 1978; Drury 1983; Blandford & Eichler 1987; Fujita et al. 2013, 2014).”
From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Drury 1983
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way
Sarkar, K. C. (2024) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-024-00152-1 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“1, following a di ff usive shock acceleration mechanism where ( p ≈ ( χ + 2) / ( χ − 1), with χ as the density compression ratio; Bell 1978; Drury 1983; Blandford & Eich-ler 1987; Fujita et al. 2013, 2014).”
BackgroundMethod
- Authors
- Drury, L. O.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Drury, L O'C
- ORCID
- Drury, L O'C
- Venue
- Reports on Progress in Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1983-08-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 973-1027
- ISSN
- 0034-4885 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6633
- OpenAlex
- W2064221922
- Cited by
- 1,713
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 74 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 105 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 65
- FWCI
- 8.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Reports on Progress in Physics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Keywords
- diffusive shock acceleration, cosmic ray acceleration, tenuous plasma, power-law energy spectrum, spherical shock, point explosion, Rankine-Hugoniot conditions, strong shock waves, perturbation expansion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review