Cited by 1,713Astrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies

An introduction to the theory of diffusive shock acceleration of energetic particles in tenuous plasmas

Open access
Drury, L O'C·1983·Reports on Progress in Physics

Abstract

The central idea of diffusive shock acceleration is presented from microscopic and macroscopic viewpoints; applied to reactionless test particles in a steady plane shock the mechanism is shown to produce a power law spectrum in momentum with a slope which, to lowest order in the ratio of plasma to particle speed, depends only on the compression in the shock. The associated time scale is found (also by a macroscopic and a microscopic method) and the problems of spherical shocks, as exemplified by a point explosion and a stellar-wind terminator, are treated by singular perturbation theory. The effect of including the particle reaction is then studied. It is shown that if the scattering is due to resonant waves these can rapidly grow with unknown consequences. The possible steady modified shock structures are classified and generalised Rankine-Hugoniot conditions found. Modifications of the spectrum are discussed on the basis of an exact, if rather artificial, solution, a high-energy asymptotic expansion and a perturbation expansion due to Blandford. It is pointed out that no steady solution can exist for very strong shocks; the possible time dependence is briefly discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0034-4885/46/8/002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A strong shock with Mach ≳5 is required to produce cosmic rays with a spectral index of p≈2.1 following diffusive shock acceleration.

    “One, however, requires a strong shock with Mach, M ≳ 5 to produce CR with a spectral index of p ≈ 2 . 1, following a diffusive shock acceleration mechanism where ( p ≈ ( χ + 2) / ( χ -1), with χ as the density compression ratio; Bell 1978; Drury 1983; Blandford & Eichler 1987; Fujita et al. 2013, 2014).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Drury, L. O.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics (DE)
Corresponding author
Drury, L O'C
Venue
Reports on Progress in Physics
Published
1983-08-01
Volume
46
Issue
8
Pages
973-1027
ISSN
  • 0034-4885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6633
OpenAlex
W2064221922
Cited by
1,713
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 74 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 105 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 65
FWCI
8.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Reports on Progress in Physics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Keywords
diffusive shock acceleration, cosmic ray acceleration, tenuous plasma, power-law energy spectrum, spherical shock, point explosion, Rankine-Hugoniot conditions, strong shock waves, perturbation expansion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review