The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TheGWmethod
Open accessAbstract
Calculations of ground-state and excited-state properties of materials have been one of the major goals of condensed matter physics. Ground-state properties of solids have been extensively investigated for several decades within the standard density functional theory. Excited-state properties, on the other hand, were relatively unexplored in ab initio calculations until a decade ago. The most suitable approach up to now for studying excited-state properties of extended systems is the Green function method. To calculate the Green function one requires the self-energy operator which is non-local and energy dependent. In this article we describe the GW approximation which has turned out to be a fruitful approximation to the self-energy. The Green function theory, numerical methods for carrying out the self-energy calculations, simplified schemes, and applications to various systems are described. Self-consistency issue and new developments beyond the GW approximation are also discussed as well as the success and shortcomings of the GW approximation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., & Ernzerhof, M. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 · Cited by 215,824
Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects
Kohn, W., & Sham, L. J. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 · Cited by 64,135
Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems
Perdew, J. P., & Zunger, A. (1981) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.5048 · Cited by 20,887
Density-Functional Theory for Time-Dependent Systems
Runge, E., & Gross, E. K. U. (1984) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.52.997 · Cited by 8,914 · cited 10×
“Recent reviews on DFT may be found in Jones and Gunnarsson (1989) and Dreizler and Gross (1990).”
BackgroundInfluentialTheory of Many-Particle Systems. I
Martin, P. C., & Schwinger, J. (1959) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.115.1342 · Cited by 1,816
Cited by
Kühne, T. D., Iannuzzi, M., Del Ben, M., Rybkin, V. V., Seewald, P., Stein, F., Laino, T., Khaliullin, R. Z., Schütt, O., Schiffmann, F., et al. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0007045 · Cited by 4,468
Electronic excitations: density-functional versus many-body Green’s-function approaches
Onida, G., Reining, L., & Rubio, A. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.601 · Cited by 4,155
Maximally localized Wannier functions: Theory and applications
Marzari, N., Mostofi, A. A., Yates, J. R., Souza, I., & Vanderbilt, D. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.1419 · Cited by 3,283
High-throughput electronic band structure calculations: Challenges and tools
Setyawan, W., & Curtarolo, S. (2010) · Computational Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.05.010 · Cited by 1,692
Optimization algorithm for the generation of ONCV pseudopotentials
Schlipf, M., & Gygi, F. (2015) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.05.011 · Cited by 1,300
Metadata
- Authors
- Aryasetiawan, F., & Gunnarsson, O.
- Venue
- Reports on Progress in Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1998-03-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 237-312
- ISSN
- 0034-4885 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6633
- OpenAlex
- W2021933156
- Cited by
- 1,816
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 25.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TheGWmethod. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0034-4885/61/3/002
- The paper
- Aryasetiawan, F., & Gunnarsson, O. (1998). TheGWmethod. Reports on Progress in Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/61/3/002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
